Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 1988; v. 78; no. 2; p. 651-671
© 1988 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PEARCE, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by DOUGLAS, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

On the use of P-wave seismograms to identify a double-couple source

R. G. PEARCE, J. A. HUDSON and A. DOUGLAS

DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, P. O. BOX 78, CARDIFF CF1 1XL, United Kingdom
MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (PROCUREMENT EXECUTIVE) BLACKNEST, BRIMPTON, READING, BERKSHIRE RG7 4RS, United Kingdom
DEPARTMENT OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND THEORETICAL PHYSICS, SILVER STREET, CAMBRIDGE CB3 9EW, United Kingdom

Abstract

We examine the likelihood of observing different values of the relative amplitude of P, pP, and sP on an earthquake seismogram, given that the source is a point double couple at a known teleseismic distance, with an unknown orientation and every orientation equally likely. A display referred to as a compatibility plot is devised to show the probability density of seismogram types over the complete range of amplitude ratios and is computed for seismograms observed at selected source-receiver distances. These plots show in a quantitative way that the occurrence of seismograms from a double-couple source is highly nonuniform within the range of amplitude ratios and that, for many of the ratios, seismograms are not generated for any orientation. It is thereby concluded that individual teleseismic relative amplitude observations can provide powerful evidence for or against the validity of the double-couple assumption. Differences in, for example, source layer velocity and above-source velocity structure are shown to have only a limited effect, so that real data can provide valuable measurements, even when appropriately wide error bounds are placed on the relative amplitudes to allow for all sources of uncertainty. A pronounced linear concentration of probability density is identified on some compatibility plots, and its existence is verified analytically.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. Bowers
On the probability of mistaking an earthquake for an explosion using the simplicity of P
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1996; 86(6): 1925 - 1934.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. W. VASCO
Moment-tensor invariants: Searching for non-double-couple earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1990; 80(2): 354 - 371.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. A. CLARK and R. G. PEARCE
Identification of multiple underground explosions using the relative amplitude method
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1988; 78(2): 885 - 897.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the Seismological Society of America.