HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by HARMSEN, S. C. Articles by ROGERS, A. M. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Inferences about the local stress field from focal mechanisms: Applications to earthquakes in the southern Great Basin of Nevada

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, BOX 25046, MS 966DENVER FEDERAL CENTER, DENVER, COLORADO 80225

Abstract

Focal mechanisms determined from regional-network earthquake data or aftershock field investigation often contain members ranging from strike slip to normal slip in extensional tectonic environments or from strike slip to thrust slip in compressional environments. Although the coexistence of normal and strike-slip faulting has suggested to some investigators that the maximum and intermediate principal stresses are of approximately equal magnitude, several have asserted that the directions of principle stresses can or must interchange to accommodate both types of mechanisms (Zoback and Zoback 1980b; Vetter and Ryall, 1983). A Coulomb-Navier criterion of slip is invoked to demonstrate that both types of mechanisms, as well as oblique members having preferred nodal-plane dips intermediate between those of the strike-slip and normal mechanisms, may be observed in a region where the stress field, resolved into principal components, is axially symmetric. The proximate coexistence of earthquakes having diverse focal mechanisms could be interpreted as evidence for an approximately axially symmetric stress field in a region where optimally oriented planes of weakness are known to exist in the host rock.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. C. Harmsen The Little Skull Mountain, Nevada, earthquake of 29 June 1992: Aftershock focal mechanisms and tectonic stress field implications Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1994; 84(5): 1484 - 1505. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. RIVERA and A. CISTERNAS Stress tensor and fault plane solutions for a population of earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1990; 80(3): 600 - 614. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. T. BJARNASON and J. C. PECHMANN Contemporary tectonics of the Wasatch front region, Utah, from earthquake focal mechanisms Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1989; 79(3): 731 - 755. [Abstract] [PDF]