Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 1986; v. 76; no. 5; p. 1215-1223
© 1986 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MEREU, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by YAPP, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

A study of the microearthquakes of the Gobles oil field area of Southwestern Ontario

R. F. MEREU, J. BRUNET, K. MORRISSEY, B. PRICE and A. YAPP

DEPARTMENT OF GEOPHYSICS UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO, LONDON, ONTARIO, Canada , N6A 5B7

Abstract

From July 1980 to August 1984, the University of Western Ontario operated a small seismic telemetry network over the Gobles oil field in Southwestern Ontario. A total of 478 small earth tremors, mainly in the 1 to 2 magnitude range were detected by this array. There were three events greater than magnitude 3 felt by residents up to 15 km from the oil field. Approximately 10 events/month were recorded on average, although the actual number was rather erratic and tended to have a winter maximum. Event locations did not correlate with the actual positions of the oil and gas wells in the field but rather are confined to two main areas, one lying 1.5 km northwest of the town of Gobles and the other just south of the town. The depths of the well-recorded events were found to be near the depth of the producing horizon. The observed first motion patterns indicated that at least two active faults almost perpendicular to each other are present in the area. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that the events are induced or triggered by fluids which are pumped in and out of wells during secondary recovery activities.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
S. Ma and D. W. Eaton
Anatomy of a Small Earthquake Swarm in Southern Ontario, Canada
Seismological Research Letters, March 1, 2009; 80(2): 214 - 223.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Seismicity of the Southern Great Lakes: Revised Earthquake Hypocenters and Possible Tectonic Controls
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2004; 94(5): 1902 - 1918.



Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
N. A. Yassir and M. B. Dusseault
Stress trajectory determinations in southwestern Ontario from borehole logs
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1992; 65(1): 169 - 177.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
C. NICHOLSON, E. ROELOFFS, and R. L. WESSON
The northeastern Ohio earthquake of 31 January 1986: Was it induced?
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1988; 78(1): 188 - 217.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the Seismological Society of America.