Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 1986; v. 76; no. 3; p. 709-723
© 1986 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SAIKIA, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by HERRMANN, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Moment-tensor solutions for three 1982 Arkansas swarm earthquakes by waveform modeling

CHANDAN K. SAIKIA and ROBERT B. HERRMANN

DEPARTMENT OF EARTH AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY, P.O. BOX 8099, LACLEDE STATION, ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI 63156

Abstract

Moment-tensor solutions of three earthquakes recorded in the 1982 Arkansas swarm area (Haar et al., 1984) are obtained. Since a correct model is essential in such analysis, the earthquake of 29 June 1982 (07h 00m 27.94s) was used as the calibration event for the final structural model. An essential component of the analysis consisted of low-pass filtering of both observed and predicted seismograms to minimize the effect of different P- and S-wave pulse shapes due to source dynamics. The choice of a 15-Hz corner frequency was governed by corner frequency estimates of 10 to 13 Hz for these events (Haar et al., 1984).

The focal mechanisms of these events are determined to be predominantly strike-slip, with east to northeast-trending pressure axes, compatible with single event focal mechanisms for other earthquakes in the swarm area (Johnston and Metzger, 1982; Chiu et al., 1984; Haar et al., 1984). The major difference is in the estimates of seismic moments, two to ten times smaller than those determined using frequency domain techniques (Haar et al., 1984). The value of this detailed analysis lies in its ability to calibrate local structure, which will hopefully permit deconvolution of the propagation effects to characterize the source properties.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Y. Tan and D. Helmberger
A New Method for Determining Small Earthquake Source Parameters Using Short-Period P Waves
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2007; 97(4): 1176 - 1195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. R. H. O'CONNELL and L. R. JOHNSON
Second-order moment tensors of microearthquakes at The Geysers geothermal field, California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1988; 78(5): 1674 - 1692.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the Seismological Society of America.