Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 1986; v. 76; no. 2; p. 329-341
© 1986 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BENDER, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Modeling source zone boundary uncertainty in seismic hazard analysis

BERNICE BENDER

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, P.O. BOX 25046DENVER FEDERAL CENTER, DENVER, COLORADO 80225

Abstract

Most probabilistic seismic hazard studies assume that future earthquakes will occur in clearly defined, seismically homogeneous areal source zones. This assumption means that modeled seismic rates change abruptly at source zone boundaries, with the result that predicted acceleration levels may differ considerably at sites a few kilometers apart near a boundary (e.g., changes of 50 to 80 per cent or more at sites 20 km apart). However, homogeneous source zones are at best an approximation, and the areal extent of such zones is usually not well determined. I propose modifying the model so that the seismicity originally associated with each point in a source zone instead be regarded as normally distributed with standard deviation {sigma} about that point; this permits seismicity to vary smoothly across source zone boundaries. When this variability is modeled, if {sigma} is 25 per cent or less of the width of the source zone, acceleration levels calculated at sites at the center of the zone and at sites on the boundary are about the same as those calculated when no location variability ({sigma} = 0) is assumed; however, calculated levels decrease at sites between the center and the boundary, and increase at sites outside the boundary. The changes tend to become larger at the higher accelerations corresponding to longer exposure times.

When earthquakes are modeled as ruptures along well-defined linear faults, predicted accelerations also increase significantly as the site location approaches the fault. However, in many cases, neither the location of a fault nor the definitions of its end points can be precisely stated. Acceleration as a function of site location will vary more smoothly if possible fault locations are regarded as either normally or uniformly distributed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Deaggregation in Magnitude, Distance, and Azimuth in the South and West of the Iberian Peninsula
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2002; 92(6): 2177 - 2185.


Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
N. RABINOWITZ and D. M. STEINBERG
Seismic hazard sensitivity analysis: A multi-parameter approach
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1991; 81(3): 796 - 817.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
N. RABINOWITZ and T. VAN ECK
A note on the fuzzy set theory concept, with an application to seismic hazard analysis
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1988; 78(4): 1603 - 1610.
[PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the Seismological Society of America.