Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 1985; v. 75; no. 6; p. 1681-1697
© 1985 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TINTI, S.
Right arrow Articles by MULARGIA, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Effects of magnitude uncertainties on estimating the parameters in the Gutenberg-Richter frequency-magnitude law

STEFANO TINTI and FRANCESCO MULARGIA

DIPARTIMENTO DI FISICA SETTORE DI GEOFISICA UNIVERSITÀ DI BOLOGNA, VIALE BERTI PICHAT 8, 40127 BOLOGNA, Italy

Abstract

The evaluation of the parameters in the Gutenberg-Richter (GR) frequency-magnitude law log Nr = a – bm is shown to be strongly affected by magnitude uncertainties. If the magnitude errors are assumed to be distributed normally with standard deviation {sigma}, the observed magnitude that we call the "apparent magnitude," becomes a random variable, and the frequency-apparent magnitude law differs from the GR relation. We show that there is a range of magnitudes within which this law may be approximated as log Na = a – bm + {gamma}2log(e). Here, {gamma}2 = ß2{sigma}2/2, [ß = b/log(e)], and Na stands for the apparent number of the earthquakes. As both the true and the apparent magnitude curves have the same slope on a logarithmic graph, the estimators usually employed for ß remain valid. However, the usual estimators for a are biased by a quantity which is a quadratic function of the error standard deviation {sigma} and of ß. This implies that the apparent number, Na, of earthquakes exceeding a given magnitude tends to be larger than the real number Nr and for realistic values of a and b (or ß), Na is expected to be even as large as twice Nr. The implications of the magnitude variability on the seismic risk analysis are also considered: in particular, the evaluations of the attenuation law parameters and of the exceedance probability of the ground motion peak acceleration are shown to be affected.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Seismological Research LettersHome page
Q. Wang, D. D. Jackson, and Y. Y. Kagan
California Earthquakes, 1800-2007: A Unified Catalog with Moment Magnitudes, Uncertainties, and Focal Mechanisms
Seismological Research Letters, May 1, 2009; 80(3): 446 - 457.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. Amorese
Applying a Change-Point Detection Method on Frequency-Magnitude Distributions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2007; 97(5): 1742 - 1749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Seismological Research LettersHome page
Y. Y. Kagan, D. D. Jackson, and Y. Rong
A New Catalog of Southern California Earthquakes, 1800-2005
Seismological Research Letters, January 1, 2006; 77(1): 30 - 38.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Statistical Estimation of the Efficiency of Earthquake Prediction Under Uncertain Identification of Target Events
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2000; 90(2): 324 - 333.


Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. A. Rhoades
Estimation of attenuation relations for strong-motion data allowing for individual earthquake magnitude uncertainties
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1997; 87(6): 1674 - 1678.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. KIJKO and M. A. SELLEVOLL
Estimation of earthquake hazard parameters from incomplete data files. Part II. Incorporation of magnitude heterogeneity
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1992; 82(1): 120 - 134.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. KIJKO and M. A. SELLEVOLL
Estimation of earthquake hazard parameters from incomplete data files. Part I. Utilization of extreme and complete catalogs with different threshold magnitudes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1989; 79(3): 645 - 654.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. TINTI and F. MULARGIA
Confidence intervals of b values for grouped magnitudes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1987; 77(6): 2125 - 2134.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
B. BENDER
Effects of observational errors in relating magnitude scales and fitting the gutenberg-richter parameter {beta}
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1987; 77(4): 1400 - 1428.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the Seismological Society of America.