Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 1985; v. 75; no. 4; p. 1087-1104
© 1985 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BULLITT, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by TOKSÖZ, M. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Three-dimensional ultrasonic modeling of Rayleigh wave propagation

JOHN T. BULLITT* and M. NAFI TOKSÖZ

EARTH RESOURCES LABORATORY DEPARTMENT OF EARTH, ATMOSPHERIC, AND PLANETARY SCIENCES MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02139

Abstract

The effects of topographic features on Rayleigh wave propagation and scattoring are investigated in the laboratory using three-dimensional ultrasonic models. Starting from simple steps, different topographic features are modeled. The effects of these features on Rayleigh wave transmission and scattering are examined as a function of wavelength and as a function of angle of incidence. In general, backscattered or reflected Rayleigh waves are small compared to transmitted waves. A significant fraction of the Rayleigh wave energy is scattered into body waves. Transmission and reflection coefficients (transmitted or reflected energy/incident energy) computed from spectral ratios vary strongly with incidence angle. At wavelengths equal to twice the step height, the fraction of incident energy scattered into body waves ranges from more than 90 per cent at normal incidence to about zero at near-grazing incidence. At each angle, transmission coefficients vary strongly with frequency. Because of frequency-dependent phase shifts, the transmitted and reflected waves are distorted.

The effect of the steps on the propagation of Rayleigh waves is demonstrated by convolving synthetic dispersed wave trains with the impulse response of the scale models. The ocean-continent margin of the Western United States is modeled as a 60° ramp scaled to 60 km height. The Tibetan Plateau is modeled as a broad mesa scaled to 40 km height. In both models, azimuthal dependence of transmitted Rayleigh waves is similar to that observed at WWSSN stations for Rayleigh waves crossing the modeled terrestrial structures.

Footnotes

* Present address: Terrametrics Research, 751 Main Street, Waltham, Massachusetts 02154.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Experimental Study of Ultrasonic Rayleigh Wave Scattering at a Thin Anisotropic Slab
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2000; 90(4): 940 - 951.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the Seismological Society of America.