Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 1985; v. 75; no. 1; p. 271-289
© 1985 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TREHU, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Coupling of ocean bottom seismometers to sediment: Results of tests with the U.S. Geological Survey ocean bottom seismometer

ANNE M. TREHU

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BRANCH OF ATLANTIC MARINE GEOLOGY, WOODS HOLE, MASSACHUSETTS 02543

Abstract

The response of an ocean bottom seismometer (OBS) to a transient pull that excites the natural OBS-sediment coupling resonance can be modeled as a mass-spring-dashpot system in which the resonant frequency and damping are functions of instrument mass and bearing radius and of the physical properties of the sediment (primarily the shear modulus). For the very soft sediments sometimes found on the sea floor, this resonance may be within the main frequency band of interest (2 to 15 Hz) for many common instrument configurations. To test the model and to find an anchor that would shift the coupling resonance to a higher frequency and decrease its amplitude, we conducted a series of tests which measured the response of the vertical and horizontal components of the U.S. Geological Survey OBS to transient pulls as a function of anchor configuration and sediment properties. The tested anchors included a concrete "flowerpot," a tripod, a plate, and a perforated plate. Sites were on soft, organic-rich ooze and on firm sand. Several small shots were also fired at the ooze site in order to compare the response of the plate and "flowerpot" anchors to seismic signals. For a given anchor at a given site, the observed response was very repeatable. We found that the model predicts the vertical coupling response quite well and that good vertical coupling can be achieved with the plate or perforated-plate anchors. The response to the horizontal pulls, however, was similar and resonant for all anchors.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Field Test of an Inexpensive, Small Broadband Ocean-Bottom Seismograph
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2003; 93(1): 152 - 171.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. A. Sohn, J. A. Hildebrand, S. C. Webb, and C. G. Fox
Hydrothermal microseismicity at the megaplume site on the southern Juan de Fuca Ridge
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1995; 85(3): 775 - 786.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. TREHU
A note on the effect of bottom currents on an ocean bottom seismometer
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1985; 75(4): 1195 - 1204.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the Seismological Society of America.