|
|
||||||||


DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING JOHN A. BLUME EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING CENTER STANFORD UNIVERSITY, STANFORD, CALIFORNIA 94305
Abstract
This paper presents a method for developing recurrence relationships which are consistent with the available geological, historical, and instrumental occurrence information. The Maximum Entropy Principle (MEP) is utilized to obtain unbiased recurrence relationships. The differences between the conventional least-squares method and the MEP method are discussed and examined through several examples. A modified MEP method is also suggested to incorporate very long-term geological information about the occurrence of large earthquakes with the short-term historical or instrumental information about small to medium-size earthquakes. It is shown that the modified MEP method can combine different sources of information with varying quality into a single minimally biased recurrence relationship. The method developed in this paper is intended for use in seismic hazard analysis.
Footnotes
* Visiting Scholar to the Blume Center, Stanford University from the Ministry of Heavy Machinery, Beijing, China.
Visiting Scholar to the Blume Center, Stanford University from the Chinese Academy of Building Research, Beijing, China.
Professor of Civil Engineering and Director of the John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Estimation of Peak Ground Accelerations of the Malay Peninsula due to Distant Sumatra Earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2002; 92(3): 1082 - 1094. |
||||
![]() |
J. Sun and T.-C. Pan The probability of very large earthquakes in Sumatra Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1995; 85(4): 1226 - 1231. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. KIJKO and M. A. SELLEVOLL Estimation of earthquake hazard parameters from incomplete data files. Part I. Utilization of extreme and complete catalogs with different threshold magnitudes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1989; 79(3): 645 - 654. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |