HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by BOORE, D. M. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Use of seismoscope records to determine M_L and peak velocities

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, 345 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD, MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 94025

Abstract

More information about ground motion can be extracted from seismoscope records than a single point on a response spectrum. To demonstrate this, the relation between seismoscope response and Wood-Anderson instrument output and peak horizontal ground velocity has been studied by simulating the various responses for a range of distances and magnitudes. The simulations show that the relation used by Jennings and Kanamori (1979) to convert from peak seismoscope readings to the peak response of a Wood-Anderson instrument has a distance- and magnitude-dependent systematic error. The error is negligible, however, for modern seismoscopes at distances of a few tens of kilometers. At several hundred kilometers, the relation underestimates the Wood-Anderson response by as much as a factor of two. The spread in Jennings and Kanamori's estimate of M_L for the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, recorded on seismoscopes having relatively low natural frequencies (0.26 and 0.5 Hz), is reduced by the results in this paper—the upper value, from a seismoscope in Carson City, Nevada, at 290 km from the fault, going from M_L = 7.2 to M_L = 7.0 and the lower value, from Yountville, California (R 60 km), going from about 6.3 to 6.4. About 0.3 units of the remaining spread may be due to local geologic site conditions. If the 0.3 units is distributed equally between the Yountville and Carson City recordings, the estimates of M_L for the San Francisco earthquake then become 6.5 and 6.8, somewhat lower than Jennings and Kanamori's final estimates of to 7. Although the error in using the relation of Jennings and Kanamori to estimate Wood-Anderson response was at most a factor of 1.6 for the 1906 earthquake, the error can be substantially larger for smaller earthquakes recorded on similar low frequency seismoscopes.

The relation between Wood-Anderson and seismoscope response used by Jennings and Kanamori can be combined with an empirical relation between peak horizontal velocity and Wood-Anderson response to predict peak velocity from seismocope recordings. The simulations show that this relation (v_max = 8.1A_wa, where v_max is the peak horizontal velocity in centimeters/second and A_wa is one-half the range of the Wood-Anderson motion in meters) forms a lower bound for estimates of peak velocity from seismoscope recordings. The relation is good for stations within about 100 km of earthquakes with moment magnitudes of about 4.5 to 6.5, and it underestimates peak velocity by factors up to 2 or 3 for larger earthquakes at distances within 100 km. An application of the simulation method to the 1976 Guatemala earthquake (moment magnitude = 7.6) results in 37 cm/sec as a lower bound to v_max, with 66 cm/sec as a more likely value, from the seismocope recording in Guatemala City (approximately 25 km from the Motagua fault).

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Source Spectral Scaling and Stress Release Estimates Using Strong-Motion Records in Greece Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2002; 92(3): 1040 - 1059.

				B. N. Margaris and D. M. Boore Determination of {Delta}{sigma} and {kappa}0 from response spectra of large earthquakes in Greece Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1998; 88(1): 170 - 182. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. ROVELLI, O. BONAMASSA, M. COCCO, M. DI BONA, and S. MAZZA Scaling laws and spectral parameters of the ground motion in active extensional areas in Italy Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1988; 78(2): 530 - 560. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. M. BOORE Short-period P- and S-wave radiation from large earthquakes: Implications for spectral scaling relations Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1986; 76(1): 43 - 64. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. M. BOORE and W. B. JOYNER A note on the use of random vibration theory to predict peak amplitudes of transient signals Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1984; 74(5): 2035 - 2039. [Abstract] [PDF]