HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by EVANS, J. R. Articles by ALLEN, S. S. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

A teleseism-specific detection algorithm for single short-period traces

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OFFICE OF EARTHQUAKE STUDIES, 345 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD, MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 94025
ARGOSYSTEMS, INC., 884 HERMOSA COURT, SUNNYVALE, CALIFORNIA 94086

Abstract

An algorithm for microprocessor-controlled seismographic recorders is described which reliably detects major phases from earthquakes more than 3° from the sensor but rejects noise events and most earthquakes closer than 3°. Unusually large earthquakes within 3° also are detected. The algorithm is applicable to field studies using triggered seismographs to record teleseismic P waves, to worldwide network automation, and to scanning records for teleseisms. It uses two band-pass filtered data streams evolved from a single short-period vertical-component seismometer to differentiate (low-frequency) teleseisms from other signals; the low-frequency band (0.5 to 2.0 Hz) declares "triggers" while the high-frequency band (3.0 to 8.0 Hz) inhibits any of these triggers generated by broadband signals such as local earthquakes. Locally generated noise is usually high frequency and does not excite the low-frequency band. A 16-bit fixed-word-length implementation of this algorithm detected 82 per cent of good P phases (readable to ±0.25 sec) occurring more than 20° from the seismograph, and 50 per cent of earthquakes between 3° and 20°, in a test data set comprising 23 hr of data in 93 segments. The same implementation of the algorithm rejected most noise and 91 per cent of earthquakes within 3° of the seismograph.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Rapid Joint Detection and Classification with Wavelet Bases via Bayes Theorem Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2000; 90(3): 764 - 774.

				M. Withers, R. Aster, C. Young, J. Beiriger, M. Harris, S. Moore, and J. Trujillo A comparison of select trigger algorithms for automated global seismic phase and event detection Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1998; 88(1): 95 - 106. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. R. Evans and A. M. Pitt Reliable automatic detection of long-period volcanic earthquakes at Long Valley caldera, California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1995; 85(5): 1518 - 1522. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. JOSWIG Pattern recognition for earthquake detection Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1990; 80(1): 170 - 186. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. CARR AGNEW Robust pilot spectrum estimation for the quality control of digital seismic data Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1989; 79(1): 180 - 188. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. BAER and U. KRADOLFER An automatic phase picker for local and teleseismic events Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1987; 77(4): 1437 - 1445. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. D. BORCHERDT, J. B. FLETCHER, E. G. JENSEN, G. L. MAXWELL, J. R. VANSCHAACK, R. E. WARRICK, E. CRANSWICK, M. J. S. JOHNSTON, and R. MCCLEARN A general earthquake-observation system (GEOS) Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1985; 75(6): 1783 - 1825. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. R. GLEDHILL An earthquake detector employing frequency domain techniques Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1985; 75(6): 1827 - 1835. [Abstract] [PDF]