Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 1983; v. 73; no. 3; p. 863-877
© 1983 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WILSON, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by KEEFER, D. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Dynamic analysis of a slope failure from the 6 August 1979 Coyote Lake, California, earthquake

RAYMOND C. WILSON and DAVID K. KEEFER

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, 345 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD, MAIL STOP 98, MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 94025

Abstract

The Coyote Lake, California, earthquake of 6 August 1979 (ML = 5.7) provided a rare opportunity to perform a dynamic numerical analysis of a seismically induced slope failure using actual strong-motion records. The earthquake displaced a preexisting slump on the northeast shore of Lake Anderson and formed a fissure 20 m long; offsets of 9 mm vertically and 18 mm horizontally were measured across the fissure. The slump is 9 km northwest of the located epicenter but within 100 m of the mapped trace of the Calaveras fault. Two strong-motion records were written in the vicinity of the slump: Coyote Creek, 5 km to the southeast, and Gilroy #6, 15 km to the southeast. These records combined with field measurements of the slope, estimates of the material properties, and a dynamic numerical model based on the Newmark analysis of seismic slope stability to calculate a predicted displacement for the landslide. A displacement of 27 mm, calculated using the N50°E component of the Gilroy #6 record, is in excellent agreement with the displacement measured in the field (21 mm). However, displacements of only 0.12 mm, calculated using the 250° component of the Coyote Creek strong-motion record, reflect significant local variations in seismic shaking intensity.

Because strong-motion records and slope failures rarely coincide, this landslide provides an important test case for our understanding of the dynamics of seismically induced landslides, as well as a warning that local seismologic variations need to be considered in any design applications.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
C. R. Real, M. J. DeLisle, and T. McCrink
Provisional seismic zoning for ground failures in portions of Los Angeles and Ventura counties following the 17 January 1994 Northridge earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1996; 86(1B): S262 - S269.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
E. L. Harp and R. W. Jibson
Seismic instrumentation of landslides: Building a better model of dynamic landslide behavior
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1995; 85(1): 93 - 99.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. W. Jibson, C. S. Prentice, B. A. Borissoff, E. A. Rogozhin, and C. J. Langer
Some observations of landslides triggered by the 29 April 1991 Racha earthquake, Republic of Georgia
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1994; 84(4): 963 - 973.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the Seismological Society of America.