| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, STOP 966, BOX 25046DENVER FEDERAL CENTER, DENVER, COLORADO 80225
Abstract
The b value estimated by fitting a set of observed earthquake magnitudes to the magnitude-frequency relationship, log N(m) = a - bm, where N(m) = number of earthquakes exceeding magnitude m, is correlated with the fitting technique used. Both so-called interval and cumulative least-squares fits to the formula log N(m) = a - bm tend statistically to estimate too low a b value, because they cannot include magnitudes above the maximum observed. Maximum likelihood formulas (Aki, Utsu, and Page) for exact or continuous magnitudes give biased results if they are applied to interval data, with the bias increasing as interval size increases. The bias is small at magnitude intervals 
m = 0.1, but significant if the formulas are applied to magnitudes which have been recovered from historic intensity data at intervals of 0.6 magnitude unit. Corrections for interval size can be applied to the continuous data formulas to make them equivalent to the formula derived specifically for grouped data (e.g., Karnik, 1971). A simpler form of the grouped data formula is derived here and shows the role of interval size and maximum magnitude on the b value obtained. This paper also shows how, given a population value of b, to calculate the distribution of the estimated b values. Conversely, this paper derives an a posteriori distribution for the population b value, given the magnitudes of an observed set of earthquakes.
The distribution of b values fitted by various techniques is illustrated for a number of cases. Several illustrations of probabilistic ground motions calculated for a range of b values show that a small fractional change in the assumed b value can have a substantially larger fractional effect on the ground motion calculated.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. Amorese Applying a Change-Point Detection Method on Frequency-Magnitude Distributions Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2007; 97(5): 1742 - 1749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 X. Lei Typical phases of pre-failure damage in granitic rocks under differential compression Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2006; 261(1): 11 - 29. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Woessner and S. Wiemer Assessing the Quality of Earthquake Catalogues: Estimating the Magnitude of Completeness and Its Uncertainty Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2005; 95(2): 684 - 698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Wyss, C. G. Sammis, R. M. Nadeau, and S. Wiemer Fractal Dimension and b-Value on Creeping and Locked Patches of the San Andreas Fault near Parkfield, California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2004; 94(2): 410 - 421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secondary Aftershocks and Their Importance for Aftershock Forecasting Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2003; 93(4): 1433 - 1448.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Upper-Truncated Power Law Applied to Earthquake Cumulative Frequency-Magnitude Distributions: Evidence for a Time-Independent Scaling Parameter Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2002; 92(8): 2983 - 2993.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties of the Aftershock Sequence of the 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine Earthquake: Implications for Aftershock Hazard Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2002; 92(4): 1227 - 1240.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Magnitude of Completeness in Earthquake Catalogs: Examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2000; 90(4): 859 - 869.
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Leonard, D. M. Steinberg, and N. Rabinowitz An indication of time-dependent seismic behavior--An assessment of paleoseismic evidence from the Arava Fault, Israel Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1998; 88(3): 767 - 776. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Frohlich, K. Kadinsky-Cade, and S. D. Davis A reexamination of the Bucaramanga, Colombia, earthquake nest Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1995; 85(6): 1622 - 1634. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. P. Nishenko, S. P. Nishenko, and G. A. Bollinger Forecasting Damaging Earthquakes in the Central and Eastern United States Science, September 21, 1990; 249(4975): 1412 - 1416. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. W. A. TAYLOR, J. A. SNOKE, I. S. SACKS, and T. TAKANAMI Nonlinear frequency-magnitude relationships for the Hokkaido corner, Japan Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1990; 80(2): 340 - 353. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. GUTTORP On least-squares estimation of b values Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1987; 77(6): 2115 - 2124. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. TINTI and F. MULARGIA Confidence intervals of b values for grouped magnitudes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1987; 77(6): 2125 - 2134. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. BENDER Effects of observational errors in relating magnitude scales and fitting the gutenberg-richter parameter {beta} Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1987; 77(4): 1400 - 1428. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. GUTTORP and D. HOPKINS On estimating varying b values Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1986; 76(3): 889 - 895. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. TINTI and F. MULARGIA Effects of magnitude uncertainties on estimating the parameters in the Gutenberg-Richter frequency-magnitude law Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1985; 75(6): 1681 - 1697. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. KIJKO A modified form of the Gutenberg-Richter magnitude-frequency relation: Maximum likelihood estimation of its parameters Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1985; 75(1): 319 - 322. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. BENDER Seismic hazard estimation using a finite-fault rupture model Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1984; 74(5): 1899 - 1923. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. C. GRANT, C. S. WEAVER, and J. E. ZOLLWEG The 14 February 1981 Elk Lake, Washington, earthquake sequence Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1984; 74(4): 1289 - 1309. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. M. DONG, A. B. BAO, and H. C. SHAH Use of Maximum Entropy Principle in earthquake recurrence relationships Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1984; 74(2): 725 - 737. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
