HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by ALLEN, R. Search for Related Content

Automatic phase pickers: Their present use and future prospects

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OFFICE OF EARTHQUAKE STUDIES, 345 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD, MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 94025

Abstract

Automatic phase-picking algorithms are designed to detect a seismic signal on a single trace and to time the arrival of the signal precisely. Because of the requirement for precise timing, a phase-picking algorithm is inherently less sensitive than one designed only to detect the presence of a signal, but still can approach the performance of a skilled analyst. A typical algorithm filters the input data and then generates a function characterizing the seismic time series. This function may be as simple as the absolute value of the series, or it may be quite complex. Event detection is accomplished by comparing the function or its short-term average (STA) with a threshold value (THR), which is commonly some multiple of a long-term average (LTA) of a characteristic function. If the STA exceeds THR, a trigger is declared. If the event passes simple criteria, it is reported. Sensitivity, expected timing error, false-trigger rate, and false-report rate are interrelated measures of performance controlled by choice of the characteristic function and several operating parameters. At present, computational power limits most systems to one-pass, time-domain algorithms. Rapidly advancing semi-conductor technology, however, will make possible much more powerful multi-pass approaches incorporating frequency-domain detection and pseudo-offline timing.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Rost, M. S. Thorne, and E. J. Garnero Imaging Global Seismic Phase Arrivals by Stacking Array Processed Short-Period Data Seismological Research Letters, November 1, 2006; 77(6): 697 - 707. [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. M. Tibuleac and J. M. Britton An Automated Short-Period Surface-Wave Detection Algorithm Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2006; 96(1): 334 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Comparison of Manual and Automatic Onset Time Picking Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2000; 90(6): 1384 - 1390.

				Rapid Joint Detection and Classification with Wavelet Bases via Bayes Theorem Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2000; 90(3): 764 - 774.

				Y.-M. Wu, T.-C. Shin, and Y.-B. Tsai Quick and reliable determination of magnitude for seismic early warning Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1998; 88(5): 1254 - 1259. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Withers, R. Aster, C. Young, J. Beiriger, M. Harris, S. Moore, and J. Trujillo A comparison of select trigger algorithms for automated global seismic phase and event detection Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1998; 88(1): 95 - 106. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Wang and T.-l. Teng Identification and picking of S phase using an artificial neural network Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1997; 87(5): 1140 - 1149. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. P. Chael An automated Rayleigh-wave detection algorithm Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1997; 87(1): 157 - 163. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. S. Gee, D. S. Neuhauser, D. S. Dreger, M. E. Pasyanos, R. A. Uhrhammer, and B. Romanowicz Real-time seismology at UC Berkeley: The Rapid Earthquake Data Integration project Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1996; 86(4): 936 - 945. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. H. Bakun, F. G. Fischer, E. G. Jensen, and J. VanSchaack Early warning system for aftershocks Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1994; 84(2): 359 - 365. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. S. Earle and P. M. Shearer Characterization of global seismograms using an automatic-picking algorithm Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1994; 84(2): 366 - 376. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. O. RUUD, C. D. LINDHOLM, and E. S. HUSEBYE An exercise in automating seismic record analysis and network bulletin production Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1993; 83(3): 660 - 679. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. L. PAVLIS Appraising relative earthquake location errors Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1992; 82(2): 836 - 859. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. A. BAME, M. C. WALCK, and K. L. HIEBERT-DODD Azimuth estimation capabilities of the NORESS regional seismic array Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1990; 80(6B): 1999 - 2015. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. JOSWIG Pattern recognition for earthquake detection Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1990; 80(1): 170 - 186. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. BAER and U. KRADOLFER An automatic phase picker for local and teleseismic events Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1987; 77(4): 1437 - 1445. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. L. PAVLIS Appraising earthquake hypocenter location errors: A complete, practical approach for single-event locations Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1986; 76(6): 1699 - 1717. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. R. GLEDHILL An earthquake detector employing frequency domain techniques Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1985; 75(6): 1827 - 1835. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. MYKKELTVEIT and H. BUNGUM Processing of regional seismic events using data from small-aperture arrays Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1984; 74(6): 2313 - 2333. [Abstract] [PDF]