HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by BOLT, B. A. Articles by ABRAHAMSON, N. A. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

New attenuation relations for peak and expected accelerations of strong ground motion

SEISMOGRAPHIC STATION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94720

Abstract

Two proposals are presented on the estimation of maximum accelerations of strong ground motion near the causative fault. First, the crucial selection of the form fitted to observed accelerations as a function of distance from the source is discussed. In particular, evidence is given that the attenuation form adopted by Joyner et al. (1981) constrains the attenuation parameters so that inferences on near-fault motion and magnitude dependence are questionable. An alternative attenuation form is proposed which decouples far-field variations from near-field variations. Nonlinear least-squares regression to the same data set confirms the flattening of attenuation curves near to the source (<10 km) in the magnitude range 5.0 < M < 7.0 and shows no indication (from the small amount of data available) of any additional increase in acceleration for M > 7 earthquakes.

For 6.0 M 7.7, the regression yields

where y is the peak horizontal acceleration in g, and x (km) is the closest distance to the surface projection of the rupture.

Second, a robust and easily computed parameter is defined for significant peak acceleration that meets many engineering requirements. This "effective" peak acceleration is obtained by developing histograms for the number of peaks and troughs on the observed record and by choosing the acceleration value at about the 90 percentile level. This truncation excludes scattered outliers of high-amplitude peaks not representative of the general distribution of the ground motion amplitudes. Corresponding values for "effective peak acceleration" are tabulated for part of the basic data set, and it is demonstrated that the scatter about the attenuation regression line is reduced using the proposed parameter.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Massa, P. Morasca, L. Moratto, S. Marzorati, G. Costa, and D. Spallarossa Empirical Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Northern Italy Using Weak- and Strong-Motion Amplitudes, Frequency Content, and Duration Parameters Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1319 - 1342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				How Accurate Can Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Relations Be? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2001; 91(6): 1917 - 1923.

				A. I. Husein Malkawi and K. J. Fahmi Locally derived earthquake ground motion attenuation relations for Jordan and conterminous areas Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, November 1, 1996; 29(4): 309 - 319. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. A. ABRAHAMSON Statistical properties of peak ground accelerations recorded by the SMART 1 array Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1988; 78(1): 26 - 41. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. SHOJA-TAHERI and J. G. ANDERSON The 1978 Tabas, Iran, earthquake: An interpretation of the strong motion records Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1988; 78(1): 142 - 171. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. SABETTA and A. PUGLIESE Attenuation of peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from italian strong-motion records Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1987; 77(5): 1491 - 1513. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. R. BRILLINGER and H. K. PREISLER Further analysis of the Joyner-Boore attenuation data Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1985; 75(2): 611 - 614. [PDF]

				W. H. BAKUN and W. B. JOYNER The ML scale in central California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1984; 74(5): 1827 - 1843. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. R. BRILLINGER and H. K. PREISLER An exploratory analysis of the Joyner-Boore attenuation data Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1984; 74(4): 1441 - 1450. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. B. JOYNER and D. M. BOORE Comments on "New Attenuation Relations for Peak and Expected Accelerations of Strong Ground Motion," by B. A. Bolt and N. A. Abrahamson Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1983; 73(5): 1479 - 1480. [PDF]

				B. A. BOLT and N. A. ABRAHAMSON Reply to W. B. Joyner and D. M. Boore's "Comments on 'New Attenuation Relations for Peak and Expected Accelerations of Strong Ground Motion'" Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1983; 73(5): 1481 - 1483. [PDF]

				G. M. ATKINSON and R. G. CHARLWOOD Uncertainties in probabilistic seismic hazard assessment as a function of probability level: A case history for Vancouver, British Columbia Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1983; 73(4): 1225 - 1241. [Abstract] [PDF]