Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 1982; v. 72; no. 6A; p. 1903-1909
© 1982 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SCHOLZ, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Scaling relations for strong ground motion in large earthquakes

C. H. SCHOLZ

LAMONT-DOHERTY GEOLOGICAL OBSERVATORY OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, PALISADES, NEW YORK 10964

Abstract

The problem we address is how to predict strong ground motions for very large earthquakes from observations made of such motions produced by events of moderate size. The discussion is in terms of two basic rupture models, a W model in which slip is controlled by fault width and an L model in which slip is controlled by fault length. Because mean slip is observed to increase linearly with fault length, a long earthquake cannot be modeled as a series of shorter events placed end to end. Rather, to explain the correlation of slip with length, a W model will predict that stress drop increases with length, whereas an L model will predict that stress drop is constant but rise time (slipping duration) increases with length. Thus, a W model predicts that peak and rms accelerations and peak and asymptotic particle velocities increase linearly with fault length. An L model predicts that rms acceleration and asymptotic velocities are independent of length but that the peak velocities increase with the square root of length and peak acceleration with Formula.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. Murphy and S. Nielsen
Estimating Earthquake Magnitude with Early Arrivals: A Test Using Dynamic and Kinematic Models
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2009; 99(1): 1 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. G. Wesnousky
Displacement and Geometrical Characteristics of Earthquake Surface Ruptures: Issues and Implications for Seismic-Hazard Analysis and the Process of Earthquake Rupture
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2008; 98(4): 1609 - 1632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A Physical Basis for Time Clustering of Large Earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2001; 91(6): 1685 - 1693.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Stress Drop, Slip Type, Earthquake Magnitude, and Seismic Hazard
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2001; 91(4): 694 - 707.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. DAS
Appropriate boundary conditions for modeling very long earthquakes and physical consequences
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1982; 72(6A): 1911 - 1926.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the Seismological Society of America.