Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 1982; v. 72; no. 2; p. 553-569
© 1982 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BAECHER, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by KEENEY, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Statistical examination of reservoir-induced seismicity

GREGORY B. BAECHER and RALPH L. KEENEY

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02139
WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS 3 EMBARCADERO CENTER, SUITE 700 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111

Abstract

The two purposes of this work are to better understand the correlates of reservoir-induced seismicity (RIS) and to develop a model for predicting RIS from reservoir characteristics. Data from 29 reservoirs associated with RIS and 205 reservoirs not associated are analyzed using statistical discriminant analysis. These analyses show significant correlations between RIS and reservoir depth and between RIS and reservoir volume, but lesser correlations of RIS with stress and with geology. Data on fault activity are too few to allow inferences of correlation.

A prediction model based on discriminant analysis and calibrated by the data provides a rough estimate of the probability of RIS for specific sites. This model does not allow precise estimates, but it does distinguish between probabilities of RIS in the range of, say 30 per cent from those of 5 per cent. The base-rate frequency of RIS, knowing nothing more than that reservoir depth exceeds 92 m (deep and very deep reservoirs), is about 14 per cent. Given the most favorable set of reservoir attributes, the present model would reduce this probability to about 3 per cent. Given the least favorable, the model would increase this probability to almost 70 per cent. The standard deviation of the larger estimates is on the order of 12 per cent (absolute).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
N. A. Abrahamson, E. Glowacka, and F. A. Nava
Major earthquakes in Mexicali Valley, Mexico, and fluid extraction at Cerro Prieto Geothermal Field
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1996; 86(1A): 93 - 105.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. K. GUPTA and K. RAJENDRAN
Large artificial water reservoirs in the vicinity of the Himalayan Foothills and reservoir-induced seismicity
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1986; 76(1): 205 - 215.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the Seismological Society of America.