Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 1982; v. 72; no. 1; p. 303-325
© 1982 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MCEVILLY, T. V.
Right arrow Articles by MAJER, E. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

ASP: An Automated Seismic Processor for microearthquake networks

T. V. MCEVILLY and E. L. MAJER

SEISMOGRAPHIC STATION DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94720
EARTH SCIENCES DIVISION LAWRENCE BERKELEY LABORATORY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94720

Abstract

ASP, a low-power, in-field Automated Seismic Processor of microearthquake network data has been designed, fabricated, and deployed for initial operation in four different field areas to monitor seismicity associated with two geothermal areas (The Geysers, California, and Cerro Prieto, Mexico), a nuclear explosion with its related collapse and aftershock sequence, and late (>1 year) activity in a major aftershock series (Livermore, California). A second ASP system, with a high-speed front-end, is used in acoustic emission (1 to 20 kHz) analysis for fracture monitoring. Each of the 15 channels of ASP (configured for up to 128 channels) automatically detects, measures times and amplitudes, and computes and fits FFT's for both the P and S waves on data sampled at 100 samples/sec. These data from each channel are then processed with a central microprocessor for hypocenter location, running b values, source parameters, event count, and P-wave polarities. The system is capable of processing a 15-station detection in approximately 40 sec, excluding printout. The initial trials have demonstrated that in-field real-time analysis of data maximizes the efficiency of microearthquake surveys allowing flexibility in experimental procedures, with a minimum of the traditional labor-intensive postprocessing. Current efforts are directed toward improving efficiency of computation and data output and in expanding software capabilities.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Moment Magnitude Determination for Local and Regional Earthquakes Based on Source Spectra
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2003; 93(1): 203 - 214.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Y.-M. Wu, T.-C. Shin, and Y.-B. Tsai
Quick and reliable determination of magnitude for seismic early warning
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1998; 88(5): 1254 - 1259.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P. S. Earle and P. M. Shearer
Characterization of global seismograms using an automatic-picking algorithm
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1994; 84(2): 366 - 376.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. F. PRUGGER and D. J. GENDZWILL
Microearthquake location: A nonlinear approach that makes use of a simplex stepping procedure
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1988; 78(2): 799 - 815.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. BAER and U. KRADOLFER
An automatic phase picker for local and teleseismic events
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1987; 77(4): 1437 - 1445.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
N. MAGOTRA, N. AHMED, and E. CHAEL
Seismic event detection and source location using single-station (three-component) data
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1987; 77(3): 958 - 971.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K. R. GLEDHILL and M. J. RANDALL
Snare: An earthquake detection and recording system for small seismograph networks
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1986; 76(5): 1485 - 1489.
[PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. MYKKELTVEIT and H. BUNGUM
Processing of regional seismic events using data from small-aperture arrays
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1984; 74(6): 2313 - 2333.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. ALLEN
Automatic phase pickers: Their present use and future prospects
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1982; 72(6B): S225 - S242.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the Seismological Society of America.