Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 1981; v. 71; no. 6; p. 1943-1962
© 1981 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HASEGAWA, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by BERRY, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Attenuation relations for strong seismic ground motion in Canada

H. S. HASEGAWA, P. W. BASHAM and M. J. BERRY

EARTH PHYSICS BRANCH DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, MINES AND RESOURCES, OTTAWA, ONTARIO Canada, K1A OY3

Abstract

Strong seismic ground motion attenuation relations based primarily on Western United States data, in conjunction with intensity data from eastern and western Canada, are employed to derive new attenuation relations for horizontal strong seismic ground motion for application throughout Canada. The following peak acceleration (ap) and peak velocity (vp) relations are proposed for use in western Canada


Formula

where M is magnitude and R hypocentral distance (km). The difference in the distance attenuation of Modified Mercalli intensity in eastern and western Canada, and an assumption of equivalent strong motion in the near field in the two regions, is applied to the western relations to derive the following relations proposed for use in eastern Canada


Formula

The proposed relations are in reasonable agreement with the small amount of strong motion data available for western and eastern Canada. Within the accuracy justified by very scattered experimental data, peak vertical and sustained horizontal acceleration and velocity can be estimated as Formula of the peak horizontal values.

The magnitude and distance dependence of acceleration and velocity parameters are sufficiently different that the relative levels of ground motion bounds in different frequency ranges will depend on the dominant magnitudes of, and distance ranges to, the earthquakes contributing risk in various regions of Canada. The results indicate the importance of mapping risk for parameters in addition to simple peak acceleration, and suggest alternative methods of deriving ground motion bounds required for the development of design response spectra.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
M. Lamontagne
Historical Earthquake Damage in the Ottawa-Gatineau Region, Canada
Seismological Research Letters, January 1, 2010; 81(1): 129 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. C. ROGERS, J. F. CASSIDY, and R. M. ELLIS
The Prince George, British Columbia, earthquake of 21 March 1986
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1990; 80(5): 1144 - 1161.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. M. BOORE and G. M. ATKINSON
Stochastic prediction of ground motion and spectral response parameters at hard-rock sites in eastern North America
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1987; 77(2): 440 - 467.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. S. HASEGAWA
Attenuation of Lg waves in the Canadian Shield
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1985; 75(6): 1569 - 1582.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P. W. BASHAM, D. H. WEICHERT, F. M. ANGLIN, and M. J. BERRY
New probabilistic strong seismic ground motion maps of Canada
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1985; 75(2): 563 - 595.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. M. ATKINSON
Attenuation of strong ground motion in Canada from a random vibrations approach
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1984; 74(6): 2629 - 2653.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. S. HASEGAWA
Lg spectra of local earthquakes recorded by the Eastern Canada Telemetered Network and spectral scaling
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1983; 73(4): 1041 - 1061.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. M. ATKINSON and R. G. CHARLWOOD
Uncertainties in probabilistic seismic hazard assessment as a function of probability level: A case history for Vancouver, British Columbia
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1983; 73(4): 1225 - 1241.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. M. BOORE and W. B. JOYNER
The empirical prediction of ground motion
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1982; 72(6B): S43 - S60.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. M. ATKINSON
Comments on "Attenuation relations for strong seismic ground motion in Canada" by H. S. Hasegawa, P. W. Basham, and M. J. Berry
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1982; 72(5): 1765 - 1770.
[PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. S. HASEGAWA, P. W. BASHAM, and M. J. BERRY
Reply to G. M. Atkinson's "comments on 'attenuation relations for strong seismic ground motion in Canada'"
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1982; 72(5): 1771 - 1774.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the Seismological Society of America.