Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 1981; v. 71; no. 6; p. 1883-1902
© 1981 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TARR, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by AMICK, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Results of recent South Carolina seismological studies

ARTHUR C. TARR, PRADEEP TALWANI, SUSAN RHEA, DAVID CARVER and DAVID AMICK*

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DENVER FEDERAL CENTER, DENVER, COLORADO 80225
DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA 29208

Abstract

Understanding of the South Carolina seismic zone and the 1886 Charleston earthquake is much improved today as a result of seismological studies which began in 1973. A permanent seismic network was installed in 1974 in South Carolina between Charleston on the Atlantic Coast and Columbia in the central part of the state. Temporary field networks of portable instruments were established in the epicentral areas of earthquakes near reservoirs in the northwest part of the state. The seismic network data have provided precise hypocenter determinations in previously known zones of continuing activity near Middleton Place and Summerville, Bowman, and in a newly identified source of seismicity near Adams Run. Several new composite focal mechanisms were determined, and abundant aftershock data were acquired. Results of recent geophysical and geological studies, when combined with the seismological results, indicate two seismic regimes in South Carolina.

The first regime covers the buried basement structure of the middle and lower Coastal Plain province, which has been shown by geophysical studies to be quite unlike Piedmont province structures to the northwest. The Middleton Place-Summerville and Bowman seismic zones are associated with buried early Mesozoic basins and large, elongate mafic intrusives inferred from coincident positive aeromagnetic and gravity anomalies. The current seismicity is concentrated in clusters rather than distributed along a northwest-trending fault zone as suggested earlier by various workers.

The second regime covers the exposed Piedmont province and the upper Coastal Plain. Earthquake activity may be associated with strain release on or near mapped faults or contacts between metamorphic belts. In particular, studies of aftershock and microearthquake activity in the vicinity of reservoirs indicates that in areas of high ambient stress, the seismicity appears to be induced by fluctuations in the impounded water and pore pressure at depth.

Footnotes

* Present address: Ebasco Services, Inc., Greensboro, North Carolina.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. MADABHUSHI and P. TALWANI
Fault plane solutions and relocations of recent earthquakes in Middleton Place Summerville Seismic Zone near Charleston, South Carolina
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1993; 83(5): 1442 - 1466.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. B. HERRMANN
Surface-wave studies of some South Carolina earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1986; 76(1): 111 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the Seismological Society of America.