Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 1981; v. 71; no. 5; p. 1561-1586
© 1981 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SIMPSON, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by NEGMATULLAEV, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Induced seismicity at Nurek Reservoir, Tadjikistan, USSR

D. W. SIMPSON and S. K. NEGMATULLAEV

LAMONT-DOHERTY GEOLOGICAL OBSERVATORY COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, PALISADES, NEW YORK 10964
TADJIK INSTITUTE OF SEISMORESISTANT CONSTRUCTION AND SEISMOLOGY, DUSHANBE, TADJIK SSR, USSR

Abstract

More than 1800 earthquakes (1.4 > M > 4.6) have occurred during the first 9 yr of filling of the 300-m deep Nurek Reservoir in Tadjikistan. This is more than four times the average rate of activity in the region prior to the start of filling. The increased seismicity has occurred in a series of bursts, the two most intense of which were related to rapid increases in water level during the first two stages of filling—to 105 m in 1972 and to 205 m in 1976. All periods of high seismicity take place when the water level is higher than it has been previously or within 10 m of its previous maximum. If the water level drops more than 10 m below its previous maximum, the level of seismicity decreases. All of the largest earthquakes and most of the bursts of activity are triggered by decreases in the rate of filling of the reservoir. Once the water level is more than 10 m above the previous maximum, the potential for increased seismicity is high. Extremely small changes in filling rate can then trigger the onset of activity. For example, the largest earthquakes all followed decreases in filling rate of approximately 0.5 m/day; and in a number of cases, increased seismicity began soon after the reservoir started to empty by rates as small as 0.2 m/day2. The response in seismicity to decreases in the filling rate is rapid. Increased activity follows abrupt decreases in filling rate with delays as short as 1 to 4 days.

As the reservoir has approached its maximum size, extending 40 km upstream from the dam, the area of induced seismicity has increased as well. The first induced earthquakes in 1971 were located 10 to 15 km southwest of the reservoir. From 1972 to 1978, activity migrated into the immediate reservoir area and followed the growth of the reservoir upstream. The first stage of activity in 1971 to 1972 was characterized by low b values and included the largest earthquakes of M = 4.6 and M = 4.3 in November 1972, when the water level first exceeded 100 m. From 1973 to 1979, activity was confined to the immediate reservoir area and b values were higher. Although the water level has risen to over 250 m, no induced earthquakes larger than M = 4.1 have occurred since November 1972.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. Mekkawi, J.-R. Grasso, and P.-A. Schnegg
A Long-Lasting Relaxation of Seismicity at Aswan Reservoir, Egypt, 1982-2001
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2004; 94(2): 479 - 492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Mechanism of Initial Seismicity Following Impoundment of the Monticello Reservoir, South Carolina
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2001; 91(6): 1582 - 1594.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. J. S. Johnston, D. P. Hill, A. T. Linde, J. Langbein, and R. Bilham
Transient deformation during triggered seismicity from the 28 June 1992 Mw = 7.3 Landers earthquake at Long Valley volcanic caldera, California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1995; 85(3): 787 - 795.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D.W. SIMPSON, W.S. LEITH, and C.H. SCHOLZ
Two types of reservoir-induced seismicity
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1988; 78(6): 2025 - 2040.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
F. M. ANGLIN and G. G. R. BUCHBINDER
Induced seismicity at the LG3 reservoir, James Bay, Quebec, Canada
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1985; 75(4): 1067 - 1076.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. FLETCHER, J. BOATWRIGHT, L. HAAR, T. HANKS, and A. MCGARR
Source parameters for aftershocks of the Oroville, California, earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1984; 74(4): 1101 - 1123.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. K. GUPTA and H. M. IYER
Are reservoir-induced earthquakes of magnitude greater double equals 5.0 at Koyna, India, preceded by pairs of earthquakes of magnitude greater double equals 4.0?
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1984; 74(3): 863 - 873.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the Seismological Society of America.