Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 1981; v. 71; no. 4; p. 985-1002
© 1981 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CARA, M.
Right arrow Articles by LE BRAS, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Multi-mode analysis of Rayleigh-type Lg. Part 2. Application to southern California and the northwestern Sierra Nevada

MICHEL CARA*, J. BERNARD MINSTER{dagger} and RONAN LE BRAS

SEISMOLOGICAL LABORATORY CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91125

Abstract

The UC diagram technique described in the companion paper (Part 1), is applied to nine sets of Lg phases recorded through the CEDAR system in southern California, and two sets of Lg phases recorded along the northwestern margin of the Sierra Nevada. A clear image of the signal is obtained in time-frequency-wavenumber space, and we discuss in particular observations at 2.5-sec period, for events 200 to 300 km outside the profiles. From the gross features of UC diagrams we conclude that a representation of Lg as a single coherent multi-mode wave train is oversimplified in the case of southern California but is more appropriate for the Sierra block. In southern California, peaks observed at group velocities smaller than 3.2 km/sec are not predicted by realistic crustal models of the area, and are probably due to lateral heterogeneities effects such as mode conversion and multipathing. On the other hand, for group velocities between 3.2 and 3.6 km/sec, peaks observed in either area can generally be interpreted in terms of overtones excited at the source and propagating through spatially averaged structures, although care must be taken to monitor the stability of the algorithm on actual short-period records.

Footnotes

* Present address: Institut de Physique du Globe, 5 rue Descartes, 67084 Strasbourg, Cedex, France.

{dagger} Present address: Systems, Science and Softward, Inc., P.O. Box 1620, La Jolla, California 92038.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
V. G. Krishna
Propagation of Regional Seismic Phases in the Indian Shield: Constraints on Crustal and Upper Mantle Velocity Models
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2004; 94(1): 29 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. B. HERRMANN
Digital processing of regional network data
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1982; 72(6B): S261 - S276.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the Seismological Society of America.