Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 1980; v. 70; no. 4; p. 1369-1379
© 1980 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by UHRHAMMER, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Analysis of small seismographic station networks

ROBERT A. UHRHAMMER

SEISMOGRAPHIC STATION DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94720

Abstract

A procedure is developed for objectively analyzing the geometrical configuration of a small seismographic station network. The elements of the parameter space covariance matrix are used to determine the uncertainty in the hypocentral parameters and their corresponding cross-correlations for a given network geometry. Likewise, the elements of the data space covariance matrix are used to determine which data supply the least information toward the solution of the system of equations and which combinations of observations are redundant. Knowledge of the variation of these covariance matrices in the vicinity of a network allows an objective basis for comparing the performance of proposed network geometrical configurations.

A small triangular quadripartite network (10-km radius) is analyzed as an example of the method. For small networks, generally the most important data are S-wave onset times at the peripheral stations and P-wave onset times at the interior stations. The single most useful indicator of the performance of a proposed network configuration is the span of the semi-major axes of the covariance matrices for hypocenters in the vicinity of the network.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Optimal Seismic Networks in Israel in the Context of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2000; 90(1): 151 - 165.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
N. RABINOWITZ and D. M. STEINBERG
Optimal configuration of a seismographic network: A statistical approach
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1990; 80(1): 187 - 196.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
N. RABINOWITZ
Microearthquake location by means of nonlinear simplex procedure
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1988; 78(1): 380 - 384.
[PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
B. R. LIENERT, E. BERG, and L. N. FRAZER
HYPOCENTER: An earthquake location method using centered, scaled, and adaptively damped least squares
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1986; 76(3): 771 - 783.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the Seismological Society of America.