Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 1979; v. 69; no. 6; p. 1965-1981
© 1979 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SAVAGE, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by MORTENSEN, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Geodetic tilt measurements along the San Andreas Fault in central California

J. C. SAVAGE, W. H. PRESCOTT, J. F. CHAMBERLAIN, M. LISOWSKI and C. E. MORTENSEN

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, 345 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD, MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 94025

Abstract

Changes in tilt have been measured by annual or semi-annual spirit level surveys of small-aperture (40 to 400 m) bench mark arrays located at borehole tiltmeter sites along the San Andreas Fault in California. Because there are six or more bench marks in most arrays, the tilt is overdetermined, and realistic estimates of uncertainties can be made. The large arrays (aperture 300 m) afford a precision (two standard deviations) of about 3 µrad in measuring tilt, and the measured tilt remains constant to within ±5 µrad over periods of up to 5 years. The small arrays (aperture <100 m) afford a precision of about 6 µrad in measuring tilt, but the measured tilt exhibits a high variability significant even at that level of precision. The lower precision of the small arrays is primarily a consequence of minor bench mark instabilities and local short-wavelength elevation disturbances (root mean square variability perhaps 0.25 mm), but the high variability of tilt measured by the small arrays appears to be a product of local intermediate-wavelength (50 to 300 m) elevation disturbances (perhaps due to the mechanisms suggested by Harrison, and Harrison and Herbst) rather than true tectonic tilting. In general, borehole tiltmeter recordings show large changes (>10 µrad) in tilt within periods on the order of a year, but the best tiltmeters exhibit a stability comparable to that obtained from surveys of the large-aperture bench mark arrays.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Working Group on California Earthquake Probabiliti
Seismic hazards in Southern California: Probable earthquakes, 1994 to 2024
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1995; 85(2): 379 - 439.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. LISOWSKI, W. H. PRESCOTT, and J. C. SAVAGE
Geodetic tilt observed near the epicenter of the St. Elias, Alaska earthquake of February 28, 1979
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1979; 69(6): 2121 - 2123.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the Seismological Society of America.