HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by WHITCOMBE, D. N. Articles by MAGUIRE, P. K. H. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

The response of the time-term method to simulated crustal structures

DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER, LEICESTER, England, LE1 7RH

Abstract

The time-term method of interpreting seismic refraction data is analyzed to examine inadequacies in the chosen time-term model by relating observational errors to the solution variance. The results obtained from data that has been simulated for various structures are investigated. This is done quantitatively for simple structures and semi-quantitatively for more complex cases. Velocity and topographic variations of the refractor are considered as signals having dominant wavelengths. It is found that the response of the time-term method to these structural variations depends on the relationship of the structural wavelength to the dimensions of the experiment and the critical distance. For all but the simplest structures, the standard error estimates that can be obtained from a time-term solution are likely to be completely inadequate as estimates of the true error. It is demonstrated that if the refractor is anything other than uniform, the effects of a complicated velocity structure may be absorbed into the time terms. Similarly it is argued that in situations in which the refractor is not horizontal, erroneous values for complex velocity coefficients (e.g., gradient, anisotropy, etc.) can be obtained if these coefficients are included in the chosen time-term model. Finally, it is indicated that reduced travel times can be used in a way that removes the "stirring pot" aspect of time-term analysis, and to determine if a data set is suitable for examination by the time-term method.

Footnotes

^* Present address: The Department of Earth Sciences, The University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, England.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. K. H. MAGUIRE CHARM II--A deep reflection profile within the central England microcraton Journal of the Geological Society, August 1, 1987; 144(4): 661 - 670. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. M. KOHLER and G. S. FUIS Travel-time, time-term, and basement depth maps for the Imperial Valley region, California, from explosions Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1986; 76(5): 1289 - 1303. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. NEIL BIRD A linear programming approach to time-term analysis Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1982; 72(6A): 2171 - 2180. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. N. Whitcombe and P. K. H. Maguire A seismic refraction investigation of the Charnian basement and granitic intrusions flanking Charnwood Forest Journal of the Geological Society, December 1, 1981; 138(6): 643 - 651. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. N. Whitcombe and P. K. H. Maguire Seismic refraction evidence for a basement ridge between the Derbyshire Dome and the W of Charnwood Forest Journal of the Geological Society, December 1, 1981; 138(6): 653 - 659. [Abstract] [PDF]