Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 1979; v. 69; no. 4; p. 1081-1105
© 1979 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GRIFFITHS, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by BOLLINGER, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The effect of Appalachian Mountain topography on seismic waves

DONALD W. GRIFFITHS and G. A. BOLLINGER

VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES, BLACKSBURG, VIRGINIA 24061

Abstract

A field program was conducted during the summer of 1977 in the Appalachian Mountains to study some of the effects of topography on seismic-wave motions. The study areas included Powell Mountain (394 m of relief) in Lee County, Virginia, Bays and River Mountains (260 m of relief) in Sullivan County, Tennessee, and Gap and Brush Mountains (236 m of relief) in Montgomery County, Virginia. The majority of the data were recorded using 1 Hz horizontal seismometers aligned parallel to the long dimension of the northeast trending ridges. Some vertical (1 Hz) data were also collected. The signal sources were quarry and mine blasts located mostly to the west and northwest of the study areas. The Tennessee earthquake of July 27, 1977 [mb (Lg) = 3.5] was recorded at Bays and River Mountains by both horizontal and vertical sensors.

The basic data consist of maximum amplitudes and their associated periods measured from the Sg-Lg coda (some Rayleigh-wave and P-wave data were also obtained) at various sites on the ridges and in the valleys. In total, 137 events were considered from which 444 measurements of trace amplitude and wave period were made. These were cast in the form of 382 amplitude ratios between the individual sites. Four of the five ridges (Powell Mountain, Gap Mountain, Bays Mountain, and River Mountain) show amplification at the mountaintops with respect to the valleys. However, one ridge, with a less pronounced crest than the others (Brush Mountain), exhibited some wave-amplitude suppression. The vertical data obtained display a lesser degree of amplification than do the horizontal data as might be expected from other published observations.

To reduce the scatter found in the individual amplitude ratios, average amplitude ratios between mountaintop and valley sites were determined. These average ratios showed that the seismic wave amplitudes at the mountaintops were amplified by factors from 1.7 to 3.4. Employing the theory for scattering of SH waves in a half-space with an irregular free surface, the predicted ground motions for each of the study areas were obtained. The comparison of the observed average ratios with these theoretical calculations indicates that a topographic effect is present but inadequately modeled by the theory.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. H. Clouser and C. A. Langston
Modeling P-Rg conversions from isolated topographic features near the NORESS array
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1995; 85(3): 859 - 873.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. Pedersen, B. Le Brun, D. Hatzfeld, M. Campillo, and P.-Y. Bard
Ground-motion amplitude across ridges
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1994; 84(6): 1786 - 1800.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. ANOOSHEHPOOR and J. N. BRUNE
Foam rubber modeling of topographic and Dam interaction effects at Pacoima Dam
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1989; 79(5): 1347 - 1360.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. ROVELLI, O. BONAMASSA, M. COCCO, M. DI BONA, and S. MAZZA
Scaling laws and spectral parameters of the ground motion in active extensional areas in Italy
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1988; 78(2): 530 - 560.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
L. GELI, P.-Y. BARD, and B. JULLIEN
The effect of topography on earthquake ground motion: A review and new results
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1988; 78(1): 42 - 63.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
F. J. SANCHEZ-SESMA
Diffraction of elastic SH waves by wedges
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1985; 75(5): 1435 - 1446.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P.-Y. BARD and B. E. TUCKER
Underground and ridge site effects: A comparison of observation and theory
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1985; 75(4): 905 - 922.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P.-Y. BARD and M. BOUCHON
The seismic response of sediment-filled valleys. Part 2. The case of incident P and SV waves
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1980; 70(5): 1921 - 1941.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the Seismological Society of America.