|
|
||||||||
DEPARTMENT OF EARTH AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY, SAINT LOUIS, MISSOURI 63103
DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY, BLACKSBURG, VIRGINIA 24061
Abstract
This paper is concerned with estimating body-wave magnitude, mb, from the intensity distribution of an earthquake. Initially, it is assumed that modified Mercalli (MM) intensity values are directly related to the (A/T)z values of 1-Hz, Lg-wave ground motion. By comparison with the intensity values of a reference earthquake, magnitudes are calculated for 41 western and central United States earthquakes. Magnitudes of these earthquakes also are determined independently, in the conventional manner, using teleseismic P-wave amplitudes. Comparison of the two sets of magnitude values indicates that the assumed relation between 1-Hz, Lg-wave (A/T)z values and MM intensity does not hold exactly over the mb range of 4.0 to 6.2. An empirical equation is derived to adjust the mb values obtained from intensity data so that they agree with the teleseismic P-wave magnitudes.
The method then is applied to estimate mb of some historical earthquakes which occurred prior to 1962. These include the set for which Kanamori and Jennings (1978) estimated ML from strong-motion accelerograms. Some noteworthy United States earthquakes also are considered. These include: the 1811 New Madrid earthquake for which mb is estimated to be 7.3; the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina earthquake, for which mb is estimated to be 6.6 to 6.9; the 1897 Giles County, Virginia earthquake, for which mb is estimated to be 5.8; the 1906 San Francisco, California earthquake, for which mb is estimated to be 6.8 to 7.1.
The intensity-attenuation method cannot be used for estimating mb of all historical earthquakes because the intensity data are not always adequate. In some cases, however, the total felt area or the area enclosed by the Modified Mercalli IV isoseism can be determined. It was found that empirical equations relating mb to these areas, which were derived for central and northeastern United States earthquakes, also apply for events in the southeast. These empirical methods are used to estimate mb values for a set of historical Virginia earthquakes.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Frequency-Dependent Lg Q within the Continental United States Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2004; 94(5): 1630 - 1643. |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Benz, A. Frankel, and D. M. Boore Regional Lg attenuation for the continental United States Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1997; 87(3): 606 - 619. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Suter, M. Carrillo-Martinez, and O. Quintero-Legorreta Macroseismic study of shallow earthquakes in the central and eastern parts of the trans-Mexican volcanic belt, Mexico Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1996; 86(6): 1952 - 1963. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. McNamara, T. J. Owens, and W. R. Walter Propagation characteristics of Lg across the Tibetan Plateau Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1996; 86(2): 457 - 469. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. DENGLER and R. MCPHERSON The 17 August 1991 Honeydew earthquake, North Coast California: A case for revising the Modified Mercalli scale in sparsely populated areas Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1993; 83(4): 1081 - 1094. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. BENT A re-examination of the 1925 Charlevoix, Quebec, earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1992; 82(5): 2097 - 2113. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. STEVENSON and J. D. AGNEW Lake Charles, Louisiana, earthquake of 16 October 1983 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1988; 78(4): 1463 - 1474. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. JIN and K. AKI Spatial and temporal correlation between coda Q and seismicity in China Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1988; 78(2): 741 - 769. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. GREENHALGH, D. DENHAM, R. MCDOUGALL, and J. M. W. RYNN Magnitude-intensity relations for Australian earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1988; 78(1): 374 - 379. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. SIBOL, G. A. BOLLINGER, and J. B. BIRCH Estimation of magnitudes in central and eastern North America using intensity and felt area Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1987; 77(5): 1635 - 1654. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. STREET Comment on "periodic energy release in the new madrid seismic zone" by Dean J. Mento, C. Patrick Ervin, and L. D. McGinnis Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1987; 77(5): 1868 - 1868. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. BENDER Effects of observational errors in relating magnitude scales and fitting the gutenberg-richter parameter {beta} Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1987; 77(4): 1400 - 1428. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. W. CAMPBELL An empirical estimate of near-source ground motion for a major, mb = 6.8, earthquake in the eastern United States Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1986; 76(1): 1 - 17. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. HERRMANN Surface-wave studies of some South Carolina earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1986; 76(1): 111 - 121. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Talwani, P. TALWANI, and J. COX Paleoseismic Evidence for Recurrence of Earthquakes near Charleston, South Carolina Science, July 26, 1985; 229(4711): 379 - 381. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. CHEN and O. W. NUTTLI Estimates of magnitudes and short-period wave attenuation of Chinese earthquakes from Modified Mercalli intensity data Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1984; 74(3): 957 - 968. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. W. NUTTLI Average seismic source-parameter relations for mid-plate earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1983; 73(2): 519 - 535. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. ROBINSON and P. TALWANI Building damage at Charleston, South Carolina, associated with the 1886 earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1983; 73(2): 633 - 652. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Bollinger, G. A. BOLLINGER, and R. L. WHEELER The Giles County, Virginia, Seismic Zone Science, March 4, 1983; 219(4588): 1063 - 1065. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. ASSUMPCAO A regional magnitude scale for Brazil Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1983; 73(1): 237 - 246. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. HERRMANN, S.-K. PARK, and C.-Y. WANG The denver earthquakes of 1967-1968 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1981; 71(3): 731 - 745. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. HERRMANN, J. W. DEWEY, and S.-K. PARK The Dulce, New Mexico, earthquake of 23 January 1966 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1980; 70(6): 2171 - 2183. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. DUMAS, H. J. DORMAN, and G. V. LATHAM A reevaluation of the August 16, 1931 Texas earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1980; 70(4): 1171 - 1180. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. STREET The southern Illinois earthquake of September 27, 1891 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1980; 70(3): 915 - 920. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. W. NUTTLI The body-wave magnitude of the great 1857 California earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1979; 69(6): 2117 - 2119. [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |