Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 1979; v. 69; no. 3; p. 893-909
© 1979 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NUTTLI, O. W.
Right arrow Articles by GRIFFITHS, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

On the relation between modified Mercalli intensity and body-wave magnitude

OTTO W. NUTTLI, G. A. BOLLINGER and DONALD W. GRIFFITHS

DEPARTMENT OF EARTH AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY, SAINT LOUIS, MISSOURI 63103
DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY, BLACKSBURG, VIRGINIA 24061

Abstract

This paper is concerned with estimating body-wave magnitude, mb, from the intensity distribution of an earthquake. Initially, it is assumed that modified Mercalli (MM) intensity values are directly related to the (A/T)z values of 1-Hz, Lg-wave ground motion. By comparison with the intensity values of a reference earthquake, magnitudes are calculated for 41 western and central United States earthquakes. Magnitudes of these earthquakes also are determined independently, in the conventional manner, using teleseismic P-wave amplitudes. Comparison of the two sets of magnitude values indicates that the assumed relation between 1-Hz, Lg-wave (A/T)z values and MM intensity does not hold exactly over the mb range of 4.0 to 6.2. An empirical equation is derived to adjust the mb values obtained from intensity data so that they agree with the teleseismic P-wave magnitudes.

The method then is applied to estimate mb of some historical earthquakes which occurred prior to 1962. These include the set for which Kanamori and Jennings (1978) estimated ML from strong-motion accelerograms. Some noteworthy United States earthquakes also are considered. These include: the 1811 New Madrid earthquake for which mb is estimated to be 7.3; the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina earthquake, for which mb is estimated to be 6.6 to 6.9; the 1897 Giles County, Virginia earthquake, for which mb is estimated to be 5.8; the 1906 San Francisco, California earthquake, for which mb is estimated to be 6.8 to 7.1.

The intensity-attenuation method cannot be used for estimating mb of all historical earthquakes because the intensity data are not always adequate. In some cases, however, the total felt area or the area enclosed by the Modified Mercalli IV isoseism can be determined. It was found that empirical equations relating mb to these areas, which were derived for central and northeastern United States earthquakes, also apply for events in the southeast. These empirical methods are used to estimate mb values for a set of historical Virginia earthquakes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Frequency-Dependent Lg Q within the Continental United States
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2004; 94(5): 1630 - 1643.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. M. Benz, A. Frankel, and D. M. Boore
Regional Lg attenuation for the continental United States
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1997; 87(3): 606 - 619.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. Suter, M. Carrillo-Martinez, and O. Quintero-Legorreta
Macroseismic study of shallow earthquakes in the central and eastern parts of the trans-Mexican volcanic belt, Mexico
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1996; 86(6): 1952 - 1963.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. E. McNamara, T. J. Owens, and W. R. Walter
Propagation characteristics of Lg across the Tibetan Plateau
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1996; 86(2): 457 - 469.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
L. DENGLER and R. MCPHERSON
The 17 August 1991 Honeydew earthquake, North Coast California: A case for revising the Modified Mercalli scale in sparsely populated areas
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1993; 83(4): 1081 - 1094.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. L. BENT
A re-examination of the 1925 Charlevoix, Quebec, earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1992; 82(5): 2097 - 2113.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. A. STEVENSON and J. D. AGNEW
Lake Charles, Louisiana, earthquake of 16 October 1983
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1988; 78(4): 1463 - 1474.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. JIN and K. AKI
Spatial and temporal correlation between coda Q and seismicity in China
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1988; 78(2): 741 - 769.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. A. GREENHALGH, D. DENHAM, R. MCDOUGALL, and J. M. W. RYNN
Magnitude-intensity relations for Australian earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1988; 78(1): 374 - 379.
[PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. S. SIBOL, G. A. BOLLINGER, and J. B. BIRCH
Estimation of magnitudes in central and eastern North America using intensity and felt area
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1987; 77(5): 1635 - 1654.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. STREET
Comment on "periodic energy release in the new madrid seismic zone" by Dean J. Mento, C. Patrick Ervin, and L. D. McGinnis
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1987; 77(5): 1868 - 1868.
[PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
B. BENDER
Effects of observational errors in relating magnitude scales and fitting the gutenberg-richter parameter {beta}
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1987; 77(4): 1400 - 1428.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K. W. CAMPBELL
An empirical estimate of near-source ground motion for a major, mb = 6.8, earthquake in the eastern United States
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1986; 76(1): 1 - 17.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. B. HERRMANN
Surface-wave studies of some South Carolina earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1986; 76(1): 111 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
P. Talwani, P. TALWANI, and J. COX
Paleoseismic Evidence for Recurrence of Earthquakes near Charleston, South Carolina
Science, July 26, 1985; 229(4711): 379 - 381.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P. CHEN and O. W. NUTTLI
Estimates of magnitudes and short-period wave attenuation of Chinese earthquakes from Modified Mercalli intensity data
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1984; 74(3): 957 - 968.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
O. W. NUTTLI
Average seismic source-parameter relations for mid-plate earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1983; 73(2): 519 - 535.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. ROBINSON and P. TALWANI
Building damage at Charleston, South Carolina, associated with the 1886 earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1983; 73(2): 633 - 652.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
G. A. Bollinger, G. A. BOLLINGER, and R. L. WHEELER
The Giles County, Virginia, Seismic Zone
Science, March 4, 1983; 219(4588): 1063 - 1065.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. ASSUMPCAO
A regional magnitude scale for Brazil
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1983; 73(1): 237 - 246.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. B. HERRMANN, S.-K. PARK, and C.-Y. WANG
The denver earthquakes of 1967-1968
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1981; 71(3): 731 - 745.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. B. HERRMANN, J. W. DEWEY, and S.-K. PARK
The Dulce, New Mexico, earthquake of 23 January 1966
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1980; 70(6): 2171 - 2183.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. B. DUMAS, H. J. DORMAN, and G. V. LATHAM
A reevaluation of the August 16, 1931 Texas earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1980; 70(4): 1171 - 1180.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. L. STREET
The southern Illinois earthquake of September 27, 1891
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1980; 70(3): 915 - 920.
[PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
O. W. NUTTLI
The body-wave magnitude of the great 1857 California earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1979; 69(6): 2117 - 2119.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the Seismological Society of America.