Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 1979; v. 69; no. 1; p. 251-270
© 1979 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FARRELL, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by BERGER, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Seismic system calibration: 1. Parametric models

W. E. FARRELL* and J. BERGER

ENGINEERING GEOSCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94720
INSTITUTE OF GEOPHYSICS AND PLANETARY PHYSICS SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,, SAN DIEGO, LA JOLLA, CALIFORNIA 92093

Abstract

We describe linear models of the IDA (International Deployment of Accelerometers) and SRO (Seismic Research Observatories) feedback seismometers obtained by straightforward analysis of the control systems. The most important property of these models is the theoretical transfer function they yield, relating Earth acceleration to output voltage. The parameterization of the theoretical transfer function is described. Several uses of the system models and transfer function are discussed, but we conclude that the parameterized models do not provide a sufficiently accurate means of describing the installed accelerometer's behavior. A speedier, more automatic and more accurate calibration can be obtained by electrically perturbing the seismometer system. This technique is discussed in Part 2.

Footnotes

* Present address: Systems, Science and Software, P.O. Box 1620, La Jolla, California 92038.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
W.-Y. Kim and G. Ekstrom
Instrument responses of digital seismographs at Borovoye, Kazakhstan, by inversion of transient calibration pulses
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1996; 86(1A): 191 - 203.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
E. R. ENGDAHL, J. PETERSON, and N. A. ORSINI
Global Digital Networks--Current status and future directions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1982; 72(6B): S243 - S259.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. L. CHOY and J. BOATWRIGHT
The rupture characteristics of two deep earthquakes inferred from broadband GDSN data
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1981; 71(3): 691 - 711.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. BERGER, D. CARR AGNEW, R. L. PARKER, and W. E. FARRELL
Seismic system calibration: 2. Cross-spectral calibration using random binary signals
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1979; 69(1): 271 - 288.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the Seismological Society of America.