|
|
||||||||
SEISMOLOGICAL LABORATORY DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL AND PLANETARY SCIENCES CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91125
Abstract
All of the earthquakes which occurred in the epicentral area of the 1971 San Fernando earthquake during the period from 1960 to 1970 were relocated by using the master-event method. Five events from 1969 to 1970 are located within a small area around the main shock epicenter. This cluster of activity is clearly separated spatially from the activity in the surrounding area, so these five events are considered foreshocks. The wave forms of these foreshocks recorded at Pasadena are, without exception, very complex, yet they are remarkably similar from event to event. The events which occurred in the same area prior to 1969 have less complex wave forms with a greater variation among them. The complexity is most likely the effect of the propagation path. A well located aftershock which occurred in the immediate vicinity of the main shock of the San Fernando earthquake has a wave form similar to that of the foreshocks, which suggests that the foreshocks are also located very close to the main shock. This complexity is probably caused by a structural heterogeneity in the fault zone near the hypocenter. The seismic rays from the foreshocks in the inferred heterogeneous zone are interpreted as multiple-reflected near the source region which yielded the complex wave form. The mechanisms of the five foreshocks are similar to each other but different from either the main shock or the aftershocks, suggesting that the foreshocks originated from a small area of stress concentration where the stress field is locally distorted from the regional field. The number of small events with S-P times between 3.8 to 6 sec recorded at Mt. Wilson each month suggests only a slight increase in activity of small earthquakes near the epicentral area during the 2-month period immediately before the main shock. However, because of our inability to locate these events, the evidence is not definitive. Since the change in the wave forms is definite the present result suggests that detailed analyses of wave forms, spectra, and mechanism can provide a powerful diagnostic method for identifying a foreshock sequence.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. N. Zhizhin, D. Rouland, J. Bonnin, A. D. Gvishiani, and A. Burtsev Rapid Estimation of Earthquake Source Parameters from Pattern Analysis of Waveforms Recorded at a Single Three-Component Broadband Station, Port Vila, Vanuatu Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2329 - 2347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-M. Wu and L.-Y. Chiao Seismic Quiescence before the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Mw 7.6 Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2006; 96(1): 321 - 327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Mori Rupture directivity and slip distribution of the M 4.3 foreshock to the 1992 Joshua Tree earthquake, Southern California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1996; 86(3): 805 - 810. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Antolik, R. M. Nadeau, R. C. Aster, and T. V. McEvilly Differential analysis of coda Q using similar microearthquakes in seismic gaps. Part 2: Application to seismograms recorded by the Parkfield High Resolution Seismic Network Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1996; 86(3): 890 - 910. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. H. Webb Spatial clustering and stress drops of foreshocks of the February 1990 Tennyson and Weber, New Zealand, earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1994; 84(6): 1739 - 1753. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. ASTER and J. SCOTT Comprehensive characterization of waveform similarity in microearthquake data sets Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1993; 83(4): 1307 - 1314. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. PECHMANN and B. S. THORBJARNARDOTTIR Waveform analysis of two preshock-main shock-aftershock sequences in Utah Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1990; 80(3): 519 - 550. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. S. THORBJARNARDOTTIR and J. C. PECHMANN Constraints on relative earthquake locations from cross-correlation of waveforms Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1987; 77(5): 1626 - 1634. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. BOWMAN and C. KISSLINGER Seismicity associated with a cluster of earthquakes of mb greater double equals 4.5 near Adak, Alaska: Evidence for an asperity? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1985; 75(1): 223 - 236. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. ISHIDA and M. OHTAKE Seismicity and waveforms of the microearthquakes before and after the Shizuoka-Seibu earthquake, central Japan Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1984; 74(2): 605 - 620. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. MCNALLY Variations in seismicity as a fundamental tool in earthquake prediction Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1982; 72(6B): S351 - S366. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. ISHIDA and H. KANAMORI Temporal variation of seismicity and spectrum of small earthquakes preceding the 1952 Kern County, California, earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1980; 70(2): 509 - 527. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |