Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; April 1978; v. 68; no. 2; p. 283-300
© 1978 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BOORE, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by JOYNER, W. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The influence of rupture incoherence on seismic directivity

DAVID M. BOORE and WILLIAM B. JOYNER

DEPARTMENT OF GEOPHYSICS STANFORD UNIVERSITY, STANFORD, CALIFORNIA 94305
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, 345 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 94025

Abstract

As has long been recognized in teleseismic studies, smooth rupture propagation significantly modifies the azimuthal variation in elastic wave radiation and introduces a dependence of peak motion on the ratio of rupture velocity to wave propagation velocity. Rupture propagation also has a first-order effect on the ground motions close to faults as calculated from models of coherent rupture. For engineering purposes, it is important to know whether the effect occurs only with coherent ruptures, or whether it is a more general phenomena of propagating faults. This question was examined by both analytical and Monte Carlo studies of models of nonuniform ruptures. The principal models were defined by ruptures moving continuously in time along the fault with random variations in rupture velocity or in slip amplitude. These models were richer in high frequencies than the corresponding smooth ruptures. The randomness introduced a new corner into the spectrum at a frequency that is simply related to the coherence length of the random variations and to the azimuth between the fault and station. The lower frequency corner due to the overall rupture was preserved. For the model with varying rupture velocity the azimuthal variation in spectral amplitude was enhanced over that for the smooth rupture. For the model with varying slip the azimuthal variation was the same as for a smooth rupture. These models showed directivity effects as strong or stronger than the corresponding smooth rupture, providing that the average rupture velocity was the same. Monte Carlo simulations with statistical models gave peak amplitudes with the same general dependence on rupture velocity as the peak amplitudes from smooth ruptures although in the mean the peak motions were enhanced in the incoherent model. An analytic expression was also derived for the mean spectrum of an extreme model in which rupture occurred in little patches distributed with complete randomness over the fault surface and in time. Even this model showed some effects of directivity. The results of our study are consistent with the interpretation that rupture propagation produces destructive interference in the radiated motion; incoherence reduces this interference and in general leads to higher peak motions and spectral levels.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. M. Day, S. H. Gonzalez, R. Anooshehpoor, and J. N. Brune
Scale-Model and Numerical Simulations of Near-Fault Seismic Directivity
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2008; 98(3): 1186 - 1206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Seismological  Research LettersHome page
J. J. Bommer, N. A. Abrahamson, F. O. Strasser, A. Pecker, P.-Y. Bard, H. Bungum, F. Cotton, D. Fah, F. Sabetta, F. Scherbaum, et al.
The Challenge of Defining Upper Bounds on Earthquake Ground Motions
Seismological Research Letters, January 1, 2004; 75(1): 82 - 95.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Observing Earthquakes Triggered in the Near Field by Dynamic Deformations
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2003; 93(1): 118 - 138.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Stochastic Fault Stress: Implications for Fault Dynamics and Ground Motion
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2002; 92(8): 3006 - 3021.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Source Spectral Scaling and Stress Release Estimates Using Strong-Motion Records in Greece
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2002; 92(3): 1040 - 1059.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P. Bernard, P. Bernard, A. Herrero, and C. Berge
Modeling directivity of heterogeneous earthquake ruptures
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1996; 86(4): 1149 - 1160.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P. Bodin and J. Gomberg
Triggered seismicity and deformation between the Landers, California, and Little Skull Mountain, Nevada, earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1994; 84(3): 835 - 843.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
W. B. JOYNER
Directivity for nonuniform ruptures
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1991; 81(4): 1391 - 1395.
[PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. M. BOORE and W. B. JOYNER
The effect of directivity on the stress parameter determined from ground motion observations
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1989; 79(6): 1984 - 1988.
[PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. DOUGLAS, J. A. HUDSON, and R. G. PEARCE
Directivity and the Doppler effect
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1988; 78(3): 1367 - 1372.
[PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. ROVELLI, O. BONAMASSA, M. COCCO, M. DI BONA, and S. MAZZA
Scaling laws and spectral parameters of the ground motion in active extensional areas in Italy
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1988; 78(2): 530 - 560.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
W. B. JOYNER
A scaling law for the spectra of large earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1984; 74(4): 1167 - 1188.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. S. PAPAGEORGIOU and K. AKI
A specific barrier model for the quantitative description of inhomogeneous faulting and the prediction of strong ground motion. I. Description of the model
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1983; 73(3): 693 - 722.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. CAMPILLO
Numerical evaluation of near-field, high-frequency radiation from quasi-dynamic circular faults
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1983; 73(3): 723 - 734.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K. AKI
Strong motion prediction using mathematical modeling techniques
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1982; 72(6B): S29 - S41.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
W. B. JOYNER and D. M. BOORE
Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong-motion records including records from the 1979 imperial valley, California, earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1981; 71(6): 2011 - 2038.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. M. BOORE and R. L. PORCELLA
Peak acceleration from strong-motion records: A postscript
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1980; 70(6): 2295 - 2297.
[PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. HARTZELL
Faulting process of the May 17, 1976 Gazli, USSR earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1980; 70(5): 1715 - 1736.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. BOATWRIGHT
A spectral theory for circular seismic sources; simple estimates of source dimension, dynamic stress drop, and radiated seismic energy
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1980; 70(1): 1 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
W. H. BAKUN, R. M. STEWART, and C. G. BUFE
Directivity in the high-frequency radiation of small earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1978; 68(5): 1253 - 1263.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. J. SWANGER and D. M. BOORE
Simulation of strong-motion displacements using surface-wave modal superposition
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1978; 68(4): 907 - 922.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1978 by the Seismological Society of America.