|
|
||||||||
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION, 6565 ARLINGTON BLVD, FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22046
Abstract
An analysis of acceleration/intensity correlations has been carried out using a new, worldwide data sample compiled for this study from data measured from nearly 1500 strong-motion accelerograms. This new data sample has been extensively analyzed using a variety of statistical models. It has been found that the correlation equation relating peak horizontal ground acceleration (aH) to Modified Mercalli intensity (IMM) which best describes the trends in the subset of this new sample consisting of the nearly 900 observations for which aH
10 cm/sec2 is
![]() |
for aH given in cm/sec2. Analyses of the dependence of this correlation on other variables such as local earthquake magnitude (M), epicentral distance (R) and the geographical region in which the earthquakes are occuring suggest that over the range of these variables encompassed by the available data, the correlation equation which best fits the data is
![]() |
where R is given in kilometers and
![]() |
Thus, the Southern European data indicate peak horizontal accelerations at fixed values of intensity, magnitude and epicentral distance which are about a factor of two higher than the corresponding values for the Western United States and Japan. Sufficient data are not yet available to determine whether this difference is due to a consistent measurement bias associated with the assignment of intensities in Southern Europe or to variations in the regional tectonic environment in which the earthquakes are occurring.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G-A. Tselentis and L. Danciu Empirical Relationships between Modified Mercalli Intensity and Engineering Ground-Motion Parameters in Greece Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2008; 98(4): 1863 - 1875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Maqsood and J. Schwarz Analysis of Building Damage during the 8 October 2005 Earthquake in Pakistan Seismological Research Letters, March 1, 2008; 79(2): 163 - 177. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Sorensen, K. Atakan, and N. Pulido Simulated Strong Ground Motions for the Great M 9.3 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake of 26 December 2004 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, January 1, 2007; 97(1A): S139 - S151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Ebel The Cape Ann, Massachusetts Earthquake of 1755: A 250th Anniversary Perspective Seismological Research Letters, January 1, 2006; 77(1): 74 - 86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Calderoni, A. Rovelli, G. Cultrera, R. M. Azzara, and G. Di Giulio Assessment of Ground Motion in Palermo, Italy, during the 6 September 2002 Mw 5.9 Earthquake Using Source Scaling Law Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2342 - 2363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Marin, J.-P. Avouac, M. Nicolas, and A. Schlupp A Probabilistic Approach to Seismic Hazard in Metropolitan France Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2004; 94(6): 2137 - 2163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Seismic Hazard Maps for Cuba and Surrounding Areas Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2003; 93(6): 2563 - 2590. |
||||
![]() |
Geologic Setting of the 1884 Bear Lake, Idaho, Earthquake: Rupture in the Hanging Wall of a Basin and Range Normal Fault Revealed by Historical and Geological Analyses Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2003; 93(4): 1621 - 1632. |
||||
![]() |
Use of Active Fault Data versus Seismicity Data in the Evaluation of Seismic Hazard in the Granada Basin (Southern Spain) Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2003; 93(4): 1670 - 1678. |
||||
![]() |
Instrumental Intensity Distribution for the Hector Mine, California, and the Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquakes: Comparison of Two Methods Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2002; 92(6): 2145 - 2162. |
||||
![]() |
Deaggregation in Magnitude, Distance, and Azimuth in the South and West of the Iberian Peninsula Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2002; 92(6): 2177 - 2185. |
||||
![]() |
Correlation of Ground Motion and Intensity for the 17 January 1994 Northridge, California, Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2001; 91(4): 739 - 752. |
||||
![]() |
Test of Source-Parameter Inversion of the Intensities of a 54,000-Death Shock of the Seventeenth Century in Southeast Sicily Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2001; 91(4): 792 - 811. |
||||
![]() |
Empirical Relationships between Modified Mercalli Intensity and Response Spectra Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2000; 90(2): 537 - 544. |
||||
![]() |
T. Toshinawa, J. J. Taber, and J. B. Berrill Distribution of ground-motion intensity inferred from questionnaire survey, earthquake recordings, and microtremor measurements--A case study in Christchurch, New Zealand, during the 1994 arthurs pass earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1997; 87(2): 356 - 369. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. I. Husein Malkawi and K. J. Fahmi Locally derived earthquake ground motion attenuation relations for Jordan and conterminous areas Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, November 1, 1996; 29(4): 309 - 319. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. CHAVEZ-GARCIA, G. PEDOTTI, D. HATZFELD, and P.-Y. BARD An experimental study of site effects near Thessaloniki (northern Greece) Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1990; 80(4): 784 - 806. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. W. CAMPBELL An empirical estimate of near-source ground motion for a major, mb = 6.8, earthquake in the eastern United States Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1986; 76(1): 1 - 17. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. BOORE and W. B. JOYNER The empirical prediction of ground motion Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1982; 72(6B): S43 - S60. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. ATKINSON Comments on "Attenuation relations for strong seismic ground motion in Canada" by H. S. Hasegawa, P. W. Basham, and M. J. Berry Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1982; 72(5): 1765 - 1770. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. S. HASEGAWA, P. W. BASHAM, and M. J. BERRY Reply to G. M. Atkinson's "comments on 'attenuation relations for strong seismic ground motion in Canada'" Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1982; 72(5): 1771 - 1774. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. S. HASEGAWA, P. W. BASHAM, and M. J. BERRY Attenuation relations for strong seismic ground motion in Canada Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1981; 71(6): 1943 - 1962. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. HERRMANN and M. J. GOERTZ A numerical study of peak ground motion scaling Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1981; 71(6): 1963 - 1979. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. CHIARUTTINI and L. SIRO The correlation of peak ground horizontal acceleration with magnitude, distance, and seismic intensity for Friuli and Ancona, Italy, and the Alpide Belt Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1981; 71(6): 1993 - 2009. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. BATTIS Regional modification of acceleration attenuation functions Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1981; 71(4): 1309 - 1321. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. N. GUPTA A note on correlation of Modified Mercalli intensity with peaks of far-field ground motion Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1980; 70(3): 925 - 932. [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |