| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
GEOPHYSICS DEPARTMENT STANFORD UNIVERSITY, STANFORD, CALIFORNIA 94305
Abstract
Recordings from a low magnification (V = 4), intermediate period (T 
5 sec) seismograph at Mt. Hamilton, within 35 km of the San Andreas fault, show about 8 sec of P-wave energy and the first half-cycle or so of the initial S wave before going off-scale. The times, polarities, and overall amplitudes are consistent with Bolt's conclusion (1968) that the main shock began closer to San Francisco than Olema, as originally proposed by Reid (1910). This and the distribution of surface slip imply a bilateral rupture, but the seismic moment for the segment to the northwest was on the order of 2.5 times greater than for the southeasterly segment. Although Mt. Hamilton is only 35 km from the rupture surface, the most massive faulting apparently took place at least 75 km away. The recording at Mt. Hamilton returned to scale after about 60 sec; the duration of energy with periods close to 5 sec was comparable to that from more recent strong-motion recordings.
Theoretical modeling using both body and surface waves showed that the surface waves dominated the motion at Mt. Hamilton. The modeling also emphasized the sensitivity of the ground motion to directivity effects and rupture velocity. The general characteristics of the data (polarity, amplitude, period content, and duration) were matched reasonably well by a simple dislocation model using fault lengths, depths, and offsets determined from independent data.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Lomax Location of the Focus and Tectonics of the Focal Region of the California Earthquake of 18 April 1906 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 846 - 860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. T. Aagaard, T. M. Brocher, D. Dolenc, D. Dreger, R. W. Graves, S. Harmsen, S. Hartzell, S. Larsen, K. McCandless, S. Nilsson, et al. Ground-Motion Modeling of the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake, Part II: Ground-Motion Estimates for the 1906 Earthquake and Scenario Events Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2008; 98(2): 1012 - 1046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. M. Allen Probabilistic Warning Times for Earthquake Ground Shaking in the San Francisco Bay Area Seismological Research Letters, May 1, 2006; 77(3): 371 - 376. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Lomax A Reanalysis of the Hypocentral Location and Related Observations for the Great 1906 California Earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2005; 95(3): 861 - 877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Anooshehpoor, T. H. Heaton, B. Shi, and J. N. Brune Estimates of the ground accelerations at Point Reyes Station during the 1906 San Francisco earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1999; 89(4): 845 - 853. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. R. Toppozada and G. Borchardt Re-evaluation of the 1836 "Hayward fault" and the 1838 San Andreas fault earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1998; 88(1): 140 - 159. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. WALD, H. KANAMORI, D. V. HELMBERGER, and T. H. HEATON Source study of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1993; 83(4): 981 - 1019. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. H. Heaton and T. H. HEATON A Model for a Seismic Computerized Alert Network Science, May 24, 1985; 228(4702): 987 - 990. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A. UHRHAMMER Microfilming of Historical Seismograms from the Mount Hamilton (Lick) seismographic station Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1983; 73(4): 1197 - 1202. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. H. SCHOLZ Scaling relations for strong ground motion in large earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1982; 72(6A): 1903 - 1909. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. H. SCHOLZ Scaling laws for large earthquakes: Consequences for physical models Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1982; 72(1): 1 - 14. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. C. JENNINGS and H. KANAMORI Determination of local magnitude, ML, from seismoscope records Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1979; 69(4): 1267 - 1288. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. H. BAKUN, R. M. STEWART, and C. G. BUFE Directivity in the high-frequency radiation of small earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1978; 68(5): 1253 - 1263. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. M. BOORE and W. B. JOYNER The influence of rupture incoherence on seismic directivity Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1978; 68(2): 283 - 300. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. A. BOLT and R. A. HANSEN The upthrow of objects in earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1977; 67(5): 1415 - 1427. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
