Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 1976; v. 66; no. 3; p. 753-788
© 1976 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VON SEGGERN, D.
Right arrow Articles by BLANDFORD, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Seismic threshold determination

DAVID VON SEGGERN and ROBERT BLANDFORD

SEISMIC DATA ANALYSIS CENTER TELEDYNE GEOTECH, 314 MONTGOMERY STREET, ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA 22314

Abstract

Accurate determination of seismic threshold requires consideration of the seismic recurrence rates, mean and variance of signals and noise, and sometimes the relationship between different magnitude scales. A three-level conceptual framework for magnitude is postulated: true, operational, and observed magnitudes. Empirical thresholds based on observed magnitudes are biased relative to the true or operational thresholds. Determination of this bias when only single stations are involved is analytically tractable, but bias for a network of stations is treated by a Monte Carlo simulation approach. This bias is examined for the cases of direct, incremental, and cumulative threshold determinations. The simulation technique demonstrates that the effects on threshold of correlated signals and noise over a network is slight but that the effects of the feedback between LR and P threshold may be significant. Both analytical and simulation results show that any casual approach to determining threshold magnitude may produce an error of several tenths of a magnitude unit. A comparison of simulated detection results is made with real data from LASA on the Kuril-Kamchatka region, and good agreement is obtained between predictions and observations.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. H. von Seggern
Seismic Background Noise and Detection Threshold in the Southern Great Basin Digital Seismic Network
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2004; 94(6): 2280 - 2298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Y. Y. KAGAN and L. KNOPOFF
Dependence of seismicity on depth
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1980; 70(5): 1811 - 1822.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
F. RINGDAL and H. BUNGUM
Noise level variation at norsar and its effect on detectability
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1977; 67(2): 479 - 492.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
F. RINGDAL
Maximum-likelihood estimation of seismic magnitude
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1976; 66(3): 789 - 802.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1976 by the Seismological Society of America.