Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 1975; v. 65; no. 5; p. 1315-1336
© 1975 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JOYNER, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by CHEN, A. T. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Calculation of nonlinear ground response in earthquakes

WILLIAM B. JOYNER and ALBERT T. F. CHEN

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, 345 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD, MENLO PARK, CALFORNIA 94025

Abstract

A method is presented for calculating the seismic response of a system of horizontal soil layers. The essential element of the method is a rheological model suggested by Iwan which takes account of the nonlinear hysteretic behavior of soils and has considerable flexibility for incorporating laboratory results on the dynamic behavior of soils. Finite rigidity is allowed in the underlying elastic medium, permitting energy to be radiated back into the underlying medium. Three alternate ways of integrating the equations of motion are compared, an implicit technique, an explicit technique, and integration along characteristics. An example is set up for comparing the different methods of integration and for comparing the nonlinear solution with a solution based on the widely used equivalent linear assumption. The example consists of a 200-m section of firm alluvium excited at its base by the N21E component of the Taft accelerogram multiplied by four to produce a peak acceleration of 0.7 g and a peak velocity of 67 cm/sec. The three techniques of integration give very similar results, but integration along characteristics has the advantage of avoiding spurious high-frequency oscillations in the acceleration time history at the surface. For the chosen example, which has a thick soil column and a strong input motion, the equivalent linear solution underestimates the intensity of surface motion for periods between 0.1 and 0.6 sec by factors exceeding two. The discrepancies, however, would probably be less for input motion of lower intensity. At longer periods the equivalent linear solution is in essential agreement with the nonlinear solution. For the same example both solutions show that, compared to a site with rock at the surface, motion at the surface of the soil is amplified for periods longer than 1.5 sec by as much as a factor of two. At shorter periods the amplitude is reduced.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
V. Gicev and M. D. Trifunac
Transient and Permanent Rotations in a Shear Layer Excited by Strong Earthquake Pulses
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2009; 99(2B): 1391 - 1403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
O. V. Pavlenko and K. Irikura
Nonlinear Behavior of Soils Revealed from the Records of the 2000 Tottori, Japan, Earthquake at Stations of the Digital Strong-Motion Network Kik-Net
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2131 - 2145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
L. F. Bonilla, R. J. Archuleta, and D. Lavallee
Hysteretic and Dilatant Behavior of Cohesionless Soils and Their Effects on Nonlinear Site Response: Field Data Observations and Modeling
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2005; 95(6): 2373 - 2395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Prediction of Nonlinear Soil Effects
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 2004; 94(5): 1609 - 1629.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Borehole Response Studies at the Garner Valley Downhole Array, Southern California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2002; 92(8): 3165 - 3179.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Changes in Shear Moduli of Liquefied and Nonliquefied Soils during the 1995 Kobe Earthquake and Its Aftershocks at Three Vertical-Array Sites
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2002; 92(5): 1952 - 1969.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Simulation of Broadband Ground Motion Including Nonlinear Soil Effects for a Magnitude 6.5 Earthquake on the Seattle Fault, Seattle, Washington
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, March 1, 2002; 92(2): 831 - 853.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Nonlinear Seismic Effects in Soils: Numerical Simulation and Study
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2001; 91(2): 381 - 396.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis Considering Nonlinear Site Effect
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2000; 90(1): 66 - 72.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. Aguirre and K. Irikura
Nonlinearity, liquefaction, and velocity variation of soft soil layers in Port Island, Kobe, during the Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquake
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1997; 87(5): 1244 - 1258.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
I. A. Beresnev and K.-L. Wen
Nonlinear soil response--A reality?
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1996; 86(6): 1964 - 1978.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
B.-H. Chin and K. Aki
Reply to Leif Wennerberg's comment on "Simultaneous study of the source, path, and site effects on strong ground motion during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake: A preliminary result on pervasive nonlinear site effects"
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1996; 86(1A): 268 - 273.
[PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. Marsh, T. J. Larkin, A. J. Haines, and R. A. Benites
Comparison of linear and nonlinear seismic responses of two-dimensional alluvial basins
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1995; 85(3): 874 - 889.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. YU, J. G. ANDERSON, and R. SIDDHARTHAN
On the characteristics of nonlinear soil response
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1993; 83(1): 218 - 244.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. GLASSMOYER and R. D. BORCHERDT
Source parameters and effects of bandwidth and local geology on high-frequency ground motions observed for aftershocks of the northeastern Ohio earthquake of 31 January 1986
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1990; 80(4): 889 - 912.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. HILL, H. BENZ, M. MURPHY, and G. SCHUSTER
Propagation and resonance of SH waves in the Salt Lake Valley, Utah
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1990; 80(1): 23 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
L. J. HWANG and H. KANAMORI
Teleseismic and strong-motion source spectra from two earthquakes in eastern Taiwan
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1989; 79(4): 935 - 944.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. A. BRAVO, F. J. SANCHEZ-SESMA, and F. J. CHAVEZ-GARCIA
Ground motion on stratified alluvial deposits for incident SH waves
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1988; 78(2): 436 - 450.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P. M. SHEARER and J. A. ORCUTT
Surface and near-surface effects on seismic waves--theory and borehole seismometer results
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1987; 77(4): 1168 - 1196.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
T. YAMAMOTO
Propagator matrix for continuously layered porous seabeds
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1983; 73(6A): 1599 - 1620.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
W. B. JOYNER, R. E. WARRICK, and T. E. FUMAL
The effect of quaternary alluvium on strong ground motion in the Coyote Lake, California, earthquake of 1979
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1981; 71(4): 1333 - 1349.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
L. R. JOHNSON and W. SILVA
The effects of unconsolidated sediments upon the ground motion during local earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1981; 71(1): 127 - 142.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. M. ROGERS, J. C. TINSLEY, W. W. HAYS, and K. W. KING
Evaluation of the relation between near-surface geological units and ground response in the vicinity of Long Beach, California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1979; 69(5): 1603 - 1622.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. DOBRY, I. M. IDRISS, and E. NG
Duration characteristics of horizontal components of strong-motion earthquake records
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1978; 68(5): 1487 - 1520.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. J. SWANGER and D. M. BOORE
Simulation of strong-motion displacements using surface-wave modal superposition
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1978; 68(4): 907 - 922.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
W. W. HAYS
Ground-response maps for Tonopah, Nevada
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1978; 68(2): 451 - 469.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
I. C. SIMPSON
Calculation of the surface motion of a layered half-space by the method of Laplace transform
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1977; 67(4): 1009 - 1027.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
W. B. JOYNER, R. E. WARRICK, and A. A. OLIVER III
Analysis of seismograms from a downhole array in sediments near San Francisco Bay
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1976; 66(3): 937 - 958.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. M. BOORE and D. J. STIERMAN
Source parameters of the Pt. Mugu, California, earthquake of February 21, 1973
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1976; 66(2): 385 - 404.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
W. B. JOYNER
A method for calculating nonlinear seismic response in two dimensions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1975; 65(5): 1337 - 1357.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1975 by the Seismological Society of America.