HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by ORPHAL, D. L. Articles by LAHOUD, J. A. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Prediction of peak ground motion from earthquakes

PHYSICS INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, 2700 MERCED STREET SAN LEANDRO, CALIFORNIA 94577
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER COMPUTER SCIENCES CORP., 6565 ARLINGTON BLV'D FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22046

Abstract

A statistical analysis shows that the peak horizontal accelerations recorded from the San Fernando earthquake of February 1971 attenuate with focal distance as R^–1.39. This attenuation rate is nearly identical to that reported for peak accelerations from underground nuclear explosions. Assuming that the derived attenuation is independent of source parameters and using data from a number of other California earthquakes, the scaling of peak horizontal acceleration with magnitude was determined statistically. Assuming that the attenuation of peak velocity and displacement with distance is identical for earthquakes and underground nuclear explosions, the scaling of earthquake peak velocity and displacement with magnitude was also determined. The equations resulting from these analyses are: a = 6.6 x 10^–2 10^0.40MR^–1.39, v = 7.26 x 10^–1 10^0.52M R^–1.34 and d = 4.71 x 10^–2 10^0.57MR^–1.18, where a, v, and d are maximum acceleration (g), velocity (in centimeters per second) and displacement (in centimeters), respectively, M is the local magnitude, and R is the focal distance (in kilometers). In this analysis, no attempt was made to account for effects of recording site geology.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. BENDER Incorporating acceleration variability into seismic hazard analysis Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1984; 74(4): 1451 - 1462. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. S. HASEGAWA, P. W. BASHAM, and M. J. BERRY Attenuation relations for strong seismic ground motion in Canada Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1981; 71(6): 1943 - 1962. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. R. MURPHY and R. A. HEWLETT Analysis of seismic response in the city of Las Vegas, Nevada: A preliminary microzonation Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1975; 65(6): 1575 - 1597. [Abstract] [PDF]