Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 1973; v. 63; no. 6-1; p. 2105-2119
© 1973 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BRUNE, J. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Earthquake modeling by stick-slip along precut surfaces in stressed foam rubber

JAMES N. BRUNE

INSTITUTE OF GEOPHYSICS AND PLANETARY PHYSICS SCRIPPS INSTITUTE OF OCEANOGRAPHY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA

Abstract

Stick-slip along precut surfaces in stressed foam rubber is similar to earthquake faulting, stick-slip in rock specimens, and theoretical predictions. An additional feature is the common occurrence of multiple events. A significant amount of slip occurs as fault creep.

For simple one-slip events on a long fault, the peak particle velocities near the center of the fault average about half the value {Delta}{sigma}ß/µ, with {Delta}{sigma}ß/µ apparently being a good upper bound. The variation is probably due to focusing by rupture propagation. On a circular fault, the peak values average 3 to 4 times less, partly a result of a greater amount of fault creep, and probably, partly a result of focusing by rupture propagation. Total stress drops are typically about 10 to 20 per cent of the absolute stress, and during individual events about 80 to 90 per cent of the released strain energy is dissipated as friction.

For multiple events the cumulative source time function is usually much longer than the source dimension divided by the shear-wave velocity. Thus, the far-field spectrum would have the shape for fractional stress drop, but the low-frequency spectral corner would not correspond to the fault dimension; thus, the inferred stress drops would be too low. Multiple events may explain some anomalously low inferred stress drops for small earthquakes and may partly explain the success of surface-wave excitation as a method of distinguishing underground nuclear explosions from earthquakes. Foam rubber models may be used to study strong motion around various types of faults and, thus, aid in the problem of microzonation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1973 by the Seismological Society of America.