Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 1973; v. 63; no. 6-1; p. 2047-2070
© 1973 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BUCHBINDER, G. G. R.
Right arrow Articles by POUPINET, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Problems related to PcP and the core-mantle boundary illustrated by two nuclear events

GOETZ G. R. BUCHBINDER* and GEORGES POUPINET

INSTITUT DE PHYSIQUE DU GLOBE, 11, QUAI SAINT BERNARD, PARIS VE, France

Abstract

Two large nuclear explosions produced a considerable number of PcP phases. Analysis of the P and PcP travel times shows a scatter of ±2 sec. It is pointed out that PcP and P times must be considered together to eliminate gross upper mantle effects on the travel times. On a worldwide basis, the PcP peak-to-peak amplitudes exhibit a scatter of up to one order of magnitude, and, thus, the reflection coefficient of the core-mantle boundary (cmb) may not be determined with any significance from them. Comparing the wave form of PcP and the wave form of P waves convolved with thin-layered models of the cmb suggests that the cmb may be approximated by a thin high-impedance liquid layer of several kilometers in thickness embedded between the mantle and the core. Such a model can explain observed dilatational arrivals and a small decrease in amplitude near {Delta} {approx} 30°. The data do not permit exact determination of the model parameters because of uncertainty in the data and insensitivity of the method and because the cmb also may be laterally inhomogeneous.

The frequency-dependence of the reflection and transmission coefficients of a layered cmb would have serious effects on the determination of inner core parameters.

Footnotes

* On leave from the Seismology Division, Earth Physics Branch, Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. A. SIPKIN and T. H. JORDAN
Regional variation of QScS
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1980; 70(4): 1071 - 1102.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
C. WRIGHT
The origin of short-period precursors to PKP
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1975; 65(3): 765 - 786.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1973 by the Seismological Society of America.