Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; February 1973; v. 63; no. 1; p. 339-354
© 1973 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MCEVILLY, T. V.
Right arrow Articles by RAZANI, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The Qir, Iran earthquake of April 10, 1972

THOMAS V. MCEVILLY and REZA RAZANI*

SEISMOGRAPHIC STATION DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING PAHLAVI UNIVERSITY, SHIRAZ, IRAN

Abstract

The destructive earthquake, Ms = 7.1 (BRK), occurred at 0537 a.m. local time, near an agricultural center in the mountainous Zagros Range of the Fars Province in the south of Iran. Leveling virtually all structures in the epicentral region, the shock killed nearly 25 per cent of the population of about 23,000 people in the devastated villages within a radius of about 50 km from the epicenter. Hardest hit was the valley complex of Qir, Karzin, and Afzar. The high percentage of death was mainly caused by structural failure and the collapse of the heavy roof of almost all adobe and masonry residential structures in the area. Structural failure of buildings with modern steel-beam roofs and of the traditional adobe and masonry-walled buildings with heavy timbered roofs in the region was due primarily to the lateral shear failure of poorly constructed adobe and masonry, lack of earthquake-resistant vertical load-carrying columns or elements, and lack of bracing and adequate tie-in in the roofs. Engineered buildings also collapsed, generally, because of defects in engineering and construction practices. Only minor cases of ground failure were observed, mainly slides in steep mountainous regions and some collapse of steep banks of rivers and irrigation channels.

Footnotes

* Present address: Earthquake Engineering and Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
O. W. NUTTLI
The excitation and attenuation of seismic crustal phases in Iran
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1980; 70(2): 469 - 485.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. A. NOWROOZI
Seismotectonic provinces of Iran
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1976; 66(4): 1249 - 1276.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1973 by the Seismological Society of America.