HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by ENGDAHL, E. R. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Seismic effects of the MILROW and CANNIKIN nuclear explosions

EARTH SCIENCES LABORATORIES ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORIES U.S. NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, BOULDER, COLORADO 80302

Abstract

Seismic effects of the underground nuclear explosions MILROW (October 1969, about 1 megaton) and CANNIKIN (November 1971, under 5 megatons) were monitored by a network of continuously recording, high-frequency, high-gain seismographs located on Amchitka and nearby islands.

Each explosion was immediately followed by hundreds of small, discrete events (m_B < 4), of similar focal mechanism and with a characteristic low-frequency signature, which were apparently related to the deterioration of the explosion cavity. This activity intensified, then terminated within minutes of a large, complex multiple event and concurrent formation of a surface subsided area that signaled complete collapse of the explosion cavity (MILROW, 37 hr; CANNIKIN, 38 hr).

A number of small explosion-stimulated tectonic events, apparently unrelated to the collapse phenomenon, occurred intermittently for several weeks following each explosion—near the explosion cavity and up to 13 km southeast of CANNIKIN ground zero along the Island. These events were confined to the upper crust of the Island, had characteristic high-frequency signatures, and, near the Rifle Range Fault, had focal mechanisms which could be correlated with pre-existing faulting. The evidence points to a short-term interaction of the explosions with local ambient tectonic stresses. Because these stresses are of relatively low level on Amchitka, the observed seismic effects were significantly less extensive and smaller than similar effects reported from high-yield explosions at the Nevada Test Site.

Continuous monitoring of the natural seismicity of the Amchitka region since 1969 has not revealed other evidence for an interaction between either MILROW or CANNIKIN and natural tectonic processes. The structural stability and apparent low level of stress in the upper crust of Amchitka suggest that the Island effectively is seismically decoupled from the active subduction zone below.

Footnotes

^* Present address: The Cooperative Institute for Research in the Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado 80302.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. R. Ford and W. R. Walter Aftershock Characteristics as a Means of Discriminating Explosions from Earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2010; 100(1): 364 - 376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. LAY, D. V. HELMBERGER, and D. G. HARKRIDER Source models and yield-scaling relations for underground nuclear explosions at Amchitka Island Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1984; 74(3): 843 - 862. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. P. MASSE Review of seismic source models for underground nuclear explosions Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1981; 71(4): 1249 - 1268. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. J. BURDICK and D. V. HELMBERGER Time functions appropriate for nuclear explosions Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1979; 69(4): 957 - 973. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. A. GROW and A. QAMAR Seismic-wave attenuation beneath the central Aleutian Arc Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1973; 63(6-1): 2155 - 2166. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. KISSLINGER and E. R. ENGDAHL The interpretation of the Wadati diagram with relaxed assumptions Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1973; 63(5): 1723 - 1736. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. N. TOKSOZ and H. H. KEHRER Tectonic strain-release characteristics of CANNIKIN Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1972; 62(6): 1425 - 1438. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. D. DICKEY, F. A. MCKEOWN, and R. C. BUCKNAM Preliminary results of ground deformation measurements near the CANNIKIN explosion Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1972; 62(6): 1505 - 1518. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. H. OLSEN, J. N. STEWART, J. E. MCNEIL, and M. J. VITOUSEK Long-period water-wave measurements for the MILROW and CANNIKIN nuclear explosions Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1972; 62(6): 1559 - 1578. [Abstract] [PDF]