Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 1971; v. 61; no. 3; p. 649-670
© 1971 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WARD, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by TOKSÖZ, M. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Causes of regional variation of magnitudes

RONALD W. WARD and M. NAFI TOKSÖZ

DEPARTMENT OF EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCES MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02139

Abstract

Data from the short and long-period seismographs at the NORSAR in Norway are used to investigate the discrimination of earthquakes and underground nuclear explosions using surface-wave versus body-wave magnitude (Ms versus mb). Earthquakes and explosions occurring within the western United States and recorded in Norway exhibit either anomalously large surface waves or anomalously low compressional body waves compared to events from central Asia. These data, as well as the results of other investigators, indicate an anomaly of 0.8 to 1.0 in Ms or 0.6 to 0.8 in mb or some linear combination of the two. The mechanism producing anomalously large Ms values from a region for explosions and the cause of lower mb values are investigated in terms of stress relaxation triggered by an explosion and regional variations in attenuation in the upper mantle beneath both the source region and the receiver region.

The method of short-period amplitude spectral ratio is applied to the records of the waves from five deep events to determine the difference in attenuation beneath different receivers. The relative Q model inferred from these data for the upper mantle from 50 to 750 km depth is QLASA = 75, QTFSO = 175, and QNORSAR = 390. The circum-Pacific island arc exhibits an apparent source attenuation asymmetry. The data from the mid-Atlantic ridge indicate that strong attenuation may be associated with parts of the ridge.

The relative difference of the Q model between LASA and NORSAR results in a difference in mb of 0.40 for distances of 60° to 80°, which agrees well with the observed differences in mb. We conclude that regional variations of attenuation in the upper mantle play an important role in regional differences in Ms versus mb relationship.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
V. F. CORMIER
The effect of attenuation on seismic body waves
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1982; 72(6B): S169 - S200.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Z. A. DER, T. W. MCELFRESH, and C. P. MRAZEK
Interpretation of short-period P-wave magnitude anomalies at selected LRSM stations
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1979; 69(4): 1149 - 1160.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. W. WARD and K. AKI
Synthesis of teleseismic P waves from sources near sinking lithospheric slabs
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1975; 65(6): 1667 - 1680.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. A. MCMECHAN and W. G. WORKMAN
P-wave amplitudes and magnitudes between 10{degrees} and 35{degrees}
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1974; 64(6): 1887 - 1899.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1971 by the Seismological Society of America.