Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; June 1970; v. 60; no. 3; p. 917-937
© 1970 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HOWELL, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by YIU, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Integrated and frequency-band magnitude, two alternative measures of the size of an earthquake

B. F. HOWELL, JR., G. M. LUNDQUIST and S. K. YIU

DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITY PARK, PENNSYLVANIA 16802

Abstract

Integrated magnitude substitutes the r.m.s. average amplitude over a pre-selected interval for the peak amplitude in the conventional body-wave magnitude formula. Frequency-band magnitude uses an equivalent quantity in the frequency domain. Integrated magnitude exhibits less scatter than conventional body-wave magnitude for short-period seismograms. Frequency-band magnitude exhibits less scatter than body-wave magnitude or integrated magnitude for both long- and short-period seismograms. The scatter of frequency-band magnitude is probably due to real azimuthal effects, crustal-transfer-function variations, errors in compensation for seismograph response, microseismic moise and uncertainties in the compensation for attenuation with distance. To observe azimuthal variations clearly, the crustal-transfer functions and seismograph response need to be known more precisely than was the case in this experiment, because these two sources of scatter can be large enough to explain all of the observed variations.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
N. K. YACOUB
"Instantaneous amplitudes": A new method to measure seismic magnitude
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1983; 73(5): 1345 - 1355.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
I. C. F. STEWART
A magnitude scale for local earthquakes in South Australia
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1975; 65(5): 1267 - 1285.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
B. F. Howell Jr.
Precision of different varieties of magnitude
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1972; 62(3): 789 - 792.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1970 by the Seismological Society of America.