Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 1969; v. 59; no. 6; p. 2343-2370
© 1969 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BLUME, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Response of higherise buildings to ground motion from underground nuclear detonations

JOHN A. BLUME

JOHN A. BLUME & ASSOCIATES RESEARCH DIVISION, 612 HOWARD STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105

Abstract

Typical data obtained thus far in the AEC nuclear test program on the response of highrise Las Vegas buildings to ground motion from distant nuclear events including BOXCAR and BENHAM are presented, together with measured building response to distant earthquakes and to wind gusts. Major variations in response spectra are shown over the city for a specific event, from period band to period band at the same location for different events, and statistical parameters are shown for the randomness of spectral response. The peak response of tall buildings is shown for the top levels in translation and in orbital motion, and in the vertical plane with simultaneous multi-level measurements. The variation of peak modal response is shown with elapsed time, modal combinations are noted, and an example of time-history computed response is compared to measured response. It is shown that highrise Las Vegas buildings respond to ground motion with considerable amplification, that the fundamental modes tend to dominate the peak responses although there are exceptions, that there can be significant modification of loading conditions because of simultaneous motion in the two horizontal axes even though a building is symmetric, and that some building periods vary with amplitude and history of non-damaging prior response while others do not. In general there are indications that code earthquake design criteria are by no means conservative.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
B. M. DOUGLAS and T. E. TRABERT
Coupled torsional dynamic analysis of a multistory building
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1973; 63(3): 1025 - 1039.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
L. L. DAVIS and L. R. WEST
Observed effects of topography on ground motion
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1973; 63(1): 283 - 298.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. A. BLUME
Highrise building characteristics and responses determined from nuclear seismology
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1972; 62(2): 519 - 540.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
B. M. DOUGLAS and P. WEIR
Multistory building response determined from ground-velocity records
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1972; 62(1): 357 - 367.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. A. BLUME
The motion and damping of buildings relative to seismic response spectra
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1970; 60(1): 231 - 259.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1969 by the Seismological Society of America.