Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 1969; v. 59; no. 6; p. 2167-2176
© 1969 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ROMIG, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by TOCHER, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Residual strains associated with a nuclear explosion

P. R. ROMIG, W. M. MAJOR, C. J. WIDEMAN and DON TOCHER

DEPARTMENT OF GEOPHYSICS COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES, GOLDEN, COLORADO
DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND GEOPHYSICS MONTANA COLLEGE OF MINERAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, BUTTE, MONTANA
EARTHQUAKE MECHANISM LABORATORY ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE SERVICE ADMINISTRATION, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

Abstract

Two quartz-bar strainmeters were entrenched north of Beatty, Nevada to observe the BENHAM underground nuclear test of December 19, 1968 (M = 6.3). These instruments, oriented approximately radially to the source, were located at distances of 28 kilometers and 71 kilometers from ground zero. Construction began on December 4, was completed by December 16, and good records were obtained during the test.

Step-like residual strains of 1.8 x 10–7 and 0.35 x 10–7, respectively, were recorded. These results agree with those reported for earthquakes of M = 6.2. They also tend to substantiate the decay with distance law of R–3/2 observed for earthquakes as opposed to the theoretical R–13.

A most significant observation was that, whereas earthquake steps do not decay within several days if at all, the strain step from BENHAM apparently decayed to near zero within half an hour. This decay with time appears to be a reflection of the pressure history of the cavity.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. P. MASSE
Review of seismic source models for underground nuclear explosions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1981; 71(4): 1249 - 1268.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P. R. ROMIG, D. TOCHER, D. BUTLER, and C. J. WIDEMAN
Strain and tilt records of the CANNIKIN nuclear test
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1972; 62(6): 1459 - 1471.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P. R. ROMIG
Interpretation of strain data--CANNIKIN nuclear test
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1972; 62(6): 1473 - 1478.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
G. BOUCHER, S. D. MALONE, and E. F. HOMUTH
Strain effects of nuclear explosions in Nevada
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1971; 61(1): 55 - 64.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
C. W. OLSEN
Soil strain near a nuclear detonation
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1970; 60(6): 1999 - 2014.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1969 by the Seismological Society of America.