Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 1969; v. 59; no. 5; p. 1969-1982
© 1969 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CHINNERY, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Earthquake magnitude and source parameters

MICHAEL A. CHINNERY

DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES BROWN UNIVERSITY, PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND

Abstract

Previous attempts to find empirical linear relationships between the magnitude, M, of an earthquake and the logarithm of one or more of the source parameters (length L, width W, displacement D) are reviewed. The fault parameters associated with a set of 27 earthquakes with strike-slip movement in the magnitude range 3.4 to 8.3 are used to test these empirical relationships. It is found that there is no linear relationship between M and log L or log W that is valid over the whole magnitude range. However, a rather good linear relationship is found between M and log D. Using all of the present data, this relationship is


Formula

If only large magnitude events are used, this becomes


Formula

Some improvement in determinations of the displacement D for low magnitude events is necessary in order to distinguish between these two formulas. It is surmised that the second may be closer to the truth. The consequences of such a relationship are discussed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Stress Drop, Slip Type, Earthquake Magnitude, and Seismic Hazard
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 2001; 91(4): 694 - 707.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. L. Wells and K. J. Coppersmith
New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1994; 84(4): 974 - 1002.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. A. NOWROOZI
Empirical relations between magnitudes and fault parameters for earthquakes in Iran
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1985; 75(5): 1327 - 1338.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. D. SINGH and H. K. GUPTA
Source dynamics of two great earthquakes of the Indian subcontinent: The Bihar-Nepal earthquake of January 15, 1934 and the Quetta earthquake of May 30, 1935
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1980; 70(3): 757 - 773.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. K. ACHARYA
Regional variations in the rupture-length magnitude relationships and their dynamical significance
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1979; 69(6): 2063 - 2084.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. B. HERRMANN, S.-H. CHENG, and O. W. NUTTLI
Archeoseismology applied to the New Madrid earthquakes of 1811 to 1812
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1978; 68(6): 1751 - 1759.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
I. C. F. STEWART
A magnitude scale for local earthquakes in South Australia
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1975; 65(5): 1267 - 1285.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. A. RODGERS
Comments on "The San Fernando Earthquake and Public School Safety" by D. E. Hudson and D. K. Jephcott
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1975; 65(5): 1507 - 1508.
[PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. J. GIBOWICZ
Variation of source properties: The Inangahua, New Zealand, aftershocks of 1968
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1975; 65(1): 261 - 276.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
I. C. F. STEWART
Trend enhancement of seismic data as a guide to structural interpretation
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1974; 64(6): 1721 - 1731.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. VERED and A. BEN-MENAHEM
Application of synthetic seismograms to the study of low-magnitude earthquakes and crustal structure in the northern Red Sea region
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1974; 64(4): 1221 - 1237.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
V. B. GERARD
Interpretation of strain steps accompanying two New Zealand earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1973; 63(5): 1753 - 1756.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P. R. ROMIG
Interpretation of strain data--CANNIKIN nuclear test
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1972; 62(6): 1473 - 1478.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. C. LIEBERMANN and P. W. POMEROY
Source dimensions of small earthquakes as determined from the size of the aftershock zone
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1970; 60(3): 879 - 890.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1969 by the Seismological Society of America.