Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; August 1967; v. 57; no. 4; p. 747-758
© 1967 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FREEDMAN, H. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Estimating earthquake magnitude

HELEN W. FREEDMAN

SEISMOGRAPHIC STATION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA

Abstract

The disturbingly large variation in magnitude estimates observable in any earthquake catalogue has led to this analysis of one particular catalogue and definition of magnitude. The method employed by the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey is analyzed in the light of theoretical considerations concerning the probability distribution of the variables involved. In particular, the truncation procedure seems to lead to estimates which consistently underestimate the magnitude for large earthquakes, and perhaps overestimate the magnitude for small ones. An alternative method is suggested which leads to estimates which are in good agreement with those provided by Berkeley, Pasadena and Lamont.

Footnotes

* After November 1966 the magnitude was defined as the average of the individual station magnitudes. Unfortunately this paper was written before the November PDE cards were published. Therefore, it has not yet been possible to study the effect of this change empiricaly.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
I. Zaslavsky-Paltiel and D. M. Steinberg
Comparison of Methods for Estimating Station Magnitude Corrections for Improved Seismologic Monitoring of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 2008; 98(1): 1 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. H. von Seggern
Seismic Background Noise and Detection Threshold in the Southern Great Basin Digital Seismic Network
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 2004; 94(6): 2280 - 2298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Statistical Estimation of the Efficiency of Earthquake Prediction Under Uncertain Identification of Target Events
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2000; 90(2): 324 - 333.


Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. E. HABERMANN and M. S. CRAIG
Comparison of Berkeley and CALNET magnitude estimates as a means of evaluating temporal consistency of magnitudes in California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1988; 78(3): 1255 - 1267.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
I. N. GUPTA and K. L. MCLAUGHLIN
Attenuation of ground motion in the Eastern United States
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1987; 77(2): 366 - 383.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K. L. MCLAUGHLIN
Network magnitude variation and magnitude bias
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1986; 76(6): 1813 - 1816.
[PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
M. H. WIRTH, R. R. BLANDFORD, and R. H. SHUMWAY
Automatic seismic array and network detection
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1976; 66(4): 1375 - 1380.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. VON SEGGERN and R. BLANDFORD
Seismic threshold determination
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1976; 66(3): 753 - 788.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
F. RINGDAL
Maximum-likelihood estimation of seismic magnitude
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1976; 66(3): 789 - 802.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
F. RINGDAL
On the estimation of seismic detection thresholds
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1975; 65(6): 1631 - 1642.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. VON SEGGERN
Joint magnitude determination and analysis of variance for explosion magnitude estimates
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1973; 63(3): 827 - 845.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
K. L. KAILA
Decay rate of P-wave amplitudes from nuclear explosions and the magnitude relations in the epicentral distance range 1{degrees} to 98{degrees}
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1970; 60(2): 447 - 460.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
E. TRYGGVASON and J. E. LAWSON JR<
The intermediate earthquake source near Bucaramanga, Colombia
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1970; 60(1): 269 - 276.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. E. WHITE
A local magnitude scale for South Austalian earthquakes
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1968; 58(3): 1041 - 1057.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1967 by the Seismological Society of America.