|
|
||||||||
INSTITUTE OF GEOPHYSICS AND PLANETARY PHYSICS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Abstract
The first aim of this paper is to define a stress-energy function which coincides with the conventional strain-energy function in a non-prestressed medium, but which has a more natural physical interpretation than strain energy for prestressed media.
The second aim is to show how consideration of prestress or residual stress may drastically change theoretical energy estimates for earthquakes.
Footnotes
* Present address: Department of Applied Mathematics, Cambridge University, England
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. CHINNERY Earthquake magnitude and source parameters Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1969; 59(5): 1969 - 1982. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. T. WU Parkfield earthquake of June 28, 1966: Magnitude and source mechanism Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1968; 58(2): 689 - 709. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-Y. KING and L. KNOPOFF Stress drop in earthquakes Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1968; 58(1): 249 - 257. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. BURRIDGE and L. KNOPOFF Model and theoretical seismicity Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1967; 57(3): 341 - 371. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. N. BRUNE and C. R. ALLEN A low-stress-drop, low-magnitude earthquake with surface faulting: The Imperial, California, earthquake of March 4, 1966 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 1967; 57(3): 501 - 514. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |