Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; October 1962; v. 52; no. 4; p. 723-746
© 1962 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RITSEMA, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

P and S amplitudes of two earthquakes of the single force couple type

A. R. RITSEMA

ROYAL NETHERLANDS METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE, DE BILT, Holland

Abstract

Fault plane solutions of the Alaska earthquake of April 7, 1958 and of the Taiwan earthquake of April 26, 1959 are presented; the solutions are based on the initial motion directions of P and S waves at many stations all over the world. Qualitatively, the data concerning both shocks relate to a focal point-source of a single force couple with moment. The field data of Davis (1960) have been used to determine the position of the fault plane in the Alaska earthquake.

It is shown that the initial motions are not implicitly needed to determine the polarization angle of the S waves, and that if the initial motion is obscured, the maximum amplitudes of S in two horizontal components will suffice.

Incident amplitudes of P and S waves were determined and compared with theoretical amplitudes in the point-source model. For the individual shocks there is a consistent difference between the observed amplitude ratio ub/ua and the theoretical ratio. This is confirmed by a frequency analysis of some of the P and S wavelets. The difference is not the same for the two shocks investigated. It seems likely that the difference is related to the size of the seismic source.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
T. HIRASAWA and W. STAUDER
Spectral analysis of body waves from the earthquake of February 18, 1956
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1964; 54(6A): 2017 - 2035.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. UDIAS
A least squares method for earthquake mechanism determination using S-wave data
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1964; 54(6A): 2037 - 2047.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
W. STAUDER and G. A. BOLLINGER
The S wave project for focal mechanism studies earthquakes of 1962
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1964; 54(6B): 2199 - 2208.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. D. FARA
A new catalogue of earthquake fault plane solutions
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1964; 54(5A): 1491 - 1517.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. E. STEVENS
Earthquake mechanism determination by S-wave data
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1964; 54(2): 457 - 474.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1962 by the Seismological Society of America.