Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; January 1953; v. 43; no. 1; p. 63-83
© 1953 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ERGIN, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Amplitude of PcP, PcS, ScS, and ScP in deep-focus earthquakes*

KAZIM ERGIN

CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, PASADENA, CALIFORNIA

Abstract

A systematic study has been made of the ratios of Formula of PcP, PcS, ScS, and ScP to that of the corresponding incident wave Formula, using intermediate and deep-focus earthquake seismograms. The results indicate that the observed ratios of the horizontal components of the waves that are reflected as P waves (i.e., PcP/P and ScP/S) and that of the vertical component of the waves that are reflected as S waves (i.e., ScS/S and PcS/P) at the mantle-core boundary are considerably larger than the theoretical ones, whereas the observed ratios of the vertical component of the first group and that of the horizontal component of the second group are in fairly good agreement with the theoretical values. Theoretical computations were based on the assumption that in the case of a longitudinal wave the vibration is in the direction of propagation and in the case of a transverse wave the vibration is perpendicular to the direction of propagation. It is further found that the behavior of the direct P and S waves is in accord with the theory, but the vibration of the ground is not in the direction of propagation for PcP and ScP and is not perpendicular to the direction of propagation for PcS and ScS.

Footnotes

* Condensed from a Ph.D. dissertation at the California Institute of Technology. Manuscript received for publication July 5, 1950.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
J. G. NEGI and S. K. UPADHYAY
Effect of anisotropy on Love wave propagation
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1968; 58(1): 259 - 266.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
O. NUTTLI
Some observations relating to the effect of the crust on long-period P-wave motion
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1964; 54(1): 141 - 149.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. L. NELSON
A study of the seismic waves SKS and SKKS
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, January 1, 1954; 44(1): 39 - 55.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1953 by the Seismological Society of America.