Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; July 1944; v. 34; no. 3; p. 161-173
© 1944 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JONES, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Earthquake magnitudes, efficiency of stations, and perceptibility of local earthquakes in the Lake Mead area*

AUSTIN E. JONES

Abstract

About a quarter of the local earthquakes recorded at Boulder City are from focal distances of five miles or less, and approximately another quarter are from distances between five and ten miles. As these earthquakes are so close to the Lake Mead stations, they are studied in somewhat different fashion from those which are so far away that focal depth of ten miles becomes negligible. It has been possible with a new formula to make an extrapolation of the Gutenberg-Richter Magnitude Scale down to one mile focal distance. With this extended scale the magnitudes of more than 1,000 local earthquakes are collected into frequency distribution tables and frequency polygons for the years 1941–1942. These tables show increase of efficiency or locating power of the Lake Mead seismograph system with better coverage and decrease of distance between stations when a fourth station is added. They show the increase of efficiency with an increase of instrumental magnification. The mode or the magnitude of the most frequently located shocks dropped from magnitude 3.0 in early 1941 to magnitude 2.5 when distances were cut between stations and probable epicenters by the station added at Boulder Dam. The magnitude dropped to 2.0 in the last half of 1942 after Benioff seismographs were placed in operation at the three other stations.

More than half the total local energy released annually is in the largest shock or group of shocks of maximum magnitude. The energy released in 1942 by local earthquakes is approximately equal to that released in 1941. The magnitude and perceptibility range of small shocks appears to be a linear function at local distances. Under exceptional circumstances, very small shocks are felt, apparently following the equation

Formula
where M is the magnitude and {Delta} the distance in miles. More generally, there is an equal chance that an earthquake will be felt and reported if the following equation is used:

Formula
This holds for local shocks of less than destructive magnitude. To extend approximately to earthquakes of large magnitude the following equation is derived:

Formula

This is for earthquakes of shallow focus.

Footnotes

* Manuscript received for publication April 27, 1944. Published with the approval of the Commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation and the Director of the Coast and Geodetic Survey.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. K. GUPTA
Are ris events of M greater double equals 5 preceded by a couple of foreshocks of M greater double equals 4?
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, February 1, 1992; 82(1): 517 - 520.
[PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
A. M. ROGERS and W. H. K. LEE
Seismic study of earthquakes in the Lake Mead, Nevada-Arizona region
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1976; 66(5): 1657 - 1681.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
H. K. GUPTA, B. K. RASTOGI, and H. NARAIN
Common features of the reservoir-associated seismic activities
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1972; 62(2): 481 - 492.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. K. GUHA, P. D. GOSAVI, J. G. PADALE, and S. C. MARWADI
An earthquake cluster at Koyna
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1971; 61(2): 297 - 315.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. B. SLEMMONS, A. E. JONES, and J. I. GIMLETT
Catalog of Nevada earthquakes, 1852-1960
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1965; 55(2): 519 - 565.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
P. G. GANE, A. L. HALES, and H. A. OLIVER
A seismic investigation of the Witwatersrand earth tremors
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 1946; 36(2): 49 - 80.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
D. S. CARDER
Seismic investigations in the Boulder Dam area, 1940-1944, and the influence of reservoir loading on local earthquake activity
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, October 1, 1945; 35(4): 175 - 192.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1944 by the Seismological Society of America.