|
|
||||||||
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, PASADENA, CALIFORNIA
Abstract
It has been found that for the zero-length-spring seismograph recently described the length of the arm need not equal the distance from the pivot to the point of attachment of the spring. The proof of the infinite period is given for the more general case, and the effect on the period of slight deviations from the conditions for infinite period is shown.
Footnotes
* [Received for publication August 5, 1934.]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Ben-Menahem A concise history of mainstream seismology: Origins, legacy, and perspectives Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, August 1, 1995; 85(4): 1202 - 1225. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. E. ROMBERG An oscillating system for a long-period seismometer for horizontal motion Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, July 1, 1961; 51(3): 373 - 379. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |